Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Am I a bad person for finding Sandy Hook FAR more upsetting than Steve Scalise being shot? [View all]LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)65. You then expect a precisely equitable concern to all acts of violence? Period?
" don't understand how folks can rank these heinous acts. They're all bad. Period...."
You then expect a precisely equitable concern to all acts of violence? Period? That premise appears irrational and unsupported at best.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Am I a bad person for finding Sandy Hook FAR more upsetting than Steve Scalise being shot? [View all]
YoungDemCA
Jun 2017
OP
Not at all. That jerk is a 2nd amendment jackoff and got shot in the ass. Too bad so sad.
The_Casual_Observer
Jun 2017
#3
Irony, meet Fate. And so far the only "action" I hear being floated is more security for Congress
flibbitygiblets
Jun 2017
#50
I think Sandy Hook is objectively more upsetting, and it has nothing to do with politics.
DanTex
Jun 2017
#6
There is no comparison between innocent children and Congressional Republicans
dalton99a
Jun 2017
#9
No. Sandy Hook shook me to the core. Scalise is still alive and will recover. No comparison. Nt.
SweetieD
Jun 2017
#10
If only your optimistic thoughts came true. I really think that if this does serve as an awakening,
renate
Jun 2017
#23
As I said in another post, even Ronald Reagan himself getting shot didn't change things.
Tommy_Carcetti
Jun 2017
#24
Absolutely not, but I see no purpose to your comparison except to minimalize what happened today.
Goodheart
Jun 2017
#21
No, you're just human. You have an opinion of some people's value over other people's value.
JCanete
Jun 2017
#25
Nope. The Reich Wing were screaming False Flag at the dead children before the
kairos12
Jun 2017
#35
NO!!!! Sandy Hook was THE worst mass shooting that has happened in my lifetime.
beaglelover
Jun 2017
#38
Can you quantify how much worse it was than, let's say, the Virginia Tech shootings?
onenote
Jun 2017
#39
IMO killing 9 and 10 years old is infinitely worse than killing college aged kids or adults.
beaglelover
Jun 2017
#40
Yep. There's no words to describe a monster who would shoot a poor defenseless 9 year old. NONE!
beaglelover
Jun 2017
#42
Maybe what I'm reacting to is the fact that I'm acquainted with the family of one of the VA Tech
onenote
Jun 2017
#72
You then expect a precisely equitable concern to all acts of violence? Period?
LanternWaste
Jun 2017
#65
I see no reason to rank horrific acts as if they're in competition with one another.
onenote
Jun 2017
#70
Most of the people shot in D.C. today COULD BE ACTIVELY INVOLVED in finding ways....
BamaRefugee
Jun 2017
#63