Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "But, but if we Get Rid of Trump, we'll End Up with Pence" [View all]SergeStorms
(20,599 posts)52. Pence is also......
a firm believer in the apocalyptic end of the world for the second coming of jebus. Would he have any qualms about STARTING that apocalypse?
Just sayin'.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You are mistaken about succession. This is an astoundingly common error.
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2017
#36
Good points. I think that Congress might rush a VP confirmation rather than a forced Ryan ascension
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2017
#91
No. Not capable of "putting country first" UNLESS you define "country" as...
TygrBright
Jun 2017
#79
You think he's incapable of kicking off the End Times by provoking a nuke incident?
TygrBright
Jun 2017
#84
Incapable no, as nearly happened by accident under at least one Democratic Pres.
hlthe2b
Jun 2017
#85
Pence is ideologically terrible, but he's less likely to start a war
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jun 2017
#4
Pence would be far less chaotic, allowing a lot more to get done as far as implementing a
Amaryllis
Jun 2017
#111
The possibility of Trump starting a diversionary war scares me more than anything
flibbitygiblets
Jun 2017
#98
doesn't much matter in the sense that no matter what, a republican will still be president
unblock
Jun 2017
#11
fair point, though i'd say we get 90% of the benefit from successfully forcing donnie out
unblock
Jun 2017
#28
I guess it is the lesser of two evils. But in this case , both are evil to the same degree.
SummerSnow
Jun 2017
#6
Disagree. If Trump is so tained he is forced out, they all are. They're all complicit and unfit to
WhiskeyGrinder
Jun 2017
#7
I think you miss your own point. Trump is tainted, and so is everyone else.
Tommy_Carcetti
Jun 2017
#14
Mike Pence is probably very very dangerous. That said, there are no real downsides to getting rid
JCanete
Jun 2017
#8
that's fair. In some ways I would rather have a Trump than a Pence. I just think under the
JCanete
Jun 2017
#74
Pence would be terrible but a) far less volatile than Trump and b) heavily tainted due to Trump.
Tommy_Carcetti
Jun 2017
#13
the administration will be totally crippled. unable to pass anything....as it is now
spanone
Jun 2017
#18
Ryan would not accept appointment as VP by Trump or Pence. Ryan wants to be Reagan in 2024
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2017
#86
Yes, I agree. Pence is very cold and efficient. Not as unpredictable but just as
Neema
Jun 2017
#108
They are all guilty of collusion and treason, per se, so take them down one at a time.
Eliot Rosewater
Jun 2017
#51
Based off of Pence's religiosity, I could hardly call him sane, but he's not a complete lunatic.
TheBlackAdder
Jun 2017
#56
we need to just take this step wise. the dumpster MUST go. then we will worry about what
NRaleighLiberal
Jun 2017
#67
was leadership Republicans plan all along," ignore trump, keep him busy" "worse case is Pence is in"
Sunlei
Jun 2017
#93
I agree with you! Also it drives me nuts people saying that. It's like they want to stop us from
Madam45for2923
Jun 2017
#97