Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

question everything

(52,099 posts)

4. I know. I am willing to serve. This is part of being a member

Reply to DesertRat (Reply #3)

Sun Jul 30, 2017, 11:31 PM

Jul 2017

but I wish that people will actually read the posts, the whole thread and, perhaps, will conclude that debating the supposedly offensive post can contribute more to our knowledge of events that just alerting.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Post removed [View all] Post removed Jul 2017 OP

Thats part of the gig man. Eko Jul 2017 #1

I've noticed I'm being asked to jury repeatedly, sometimes on odd complaints. Shrike47 Jul 2017 #2

Same here. I thought the old system was easier to adjudicate. Laffy Kat Jul 2017 #13

Agreed, and there is no place for comments. flor-de-jasmim Jul 2017 #27

I'm confused at times as to what the issue is as well Bettie Jul 2017 #32

You can go to your account and turn off Willingness to serve on juries DesertRat Jul 2017 #3

I know. I am willing to serve. This is part of being a member question everything Jul 2017 #4

Agreed. nt DesertRat Jul 2017 #7

There are things I've been debating and gently responding to for years - and frankly, Ms. Toad Jul 2017 #9

Agreed, implying that Scaramucci was gay pissed me off. beam me up scottie Jul 2017 #16

I'm not convinced this entire membership is liberal. Dyedinthewoolliberal Jul 2017 #17

Good point. beam me up scottie Jul 2017 #18

:) Dyedinthewoolliberal Jul 2017 #19

Well, Thats a pretty harsh statement IMO.................. Old Vet Jul 2017 #20

They referred to him as a "goomba" too. Drahthaardogs Jul 2017 #31

Someone here used that term? beam me up scottie Jul 2017 #35

Oh yes, TWICE Drahthaardogs Jul 2017 #36

I must say that 'adding to the discussion' is not a criteria according to TOS and you agreed upon Demsrule86 Jul 2017 #25

Context is important and Bettie Jul 2017 #33

What's your guilty rate? SCantiGOP Jul 2017 #5

Even less question everything Jul 2017 #6

I like to argue but SCantiGOP Jul 2017 #8

same here. samnsara Jul 2017 #30

Thanks for the reminder rufus dog Jul 2017 #10

It means you need to call someone a liar Bradical79 Jul 2017 #11

Hair trigger alerting is why DU needs to track who is doing the alerting Warpy Jul 2017 #12

Yep. I got a stalker. Jakes Progress Jul 2017 #14

You've got tin foil? You're so lucky! WheelWalker Jul 2017 #15

There are mechanisms already in place...read Ask the Administrators. Demsrule86 Jul 2017 #24

Trolls. Raine1967 Jul 2017 #21

Once you rack up some hides The Polack MSgt Jul 2017 #22

You can choose not to serve on juries anytime you want. Demsrule86 Jul 2017 #26

That is not the job of a jury...you look at the rules period. You can opt out you know. Demsrule86 Jul 2017 #23

Some of them are pretty stupid too. smirkymonkey Jul 2017 #28

same here. i actually had a post removed and i challanged it.. it was a very innocent remark.. samnsara Jul 2017 #29

Most alerts I've seen aren't worth hiding Renew Deal Jul 2017 #34