General Discussion

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)

39. Yep. Read something earlier about how much money he raked in when he just had minor hurricane damage

Reply to JoeStuckInOH (Original post)

Thu Sep 7, 2017, 02:20 PM

Sep 2017

in the past. He would definitely come out ahead and just build it mo bigger.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I'm unsure why everyone keeps wishing for Mar-a-lago and other Trump properties to be destroyed. [View all] JoeStuckInOH Sep 2017 OP

Translation: Tsk, tsk everyone. FSogol Sep 2017 #1

I dont think so. It's pretty accurate. He'll make a fortune if he has property damage. n/t Lucinda Sep 2017 #38

the scary thing is that these hurricanes might cause many insurers to go bankrupt. kimbutgar Sep 2017 #2

No. Government doesn't allow geographic over-involvement for that reason, Hortensis Sep 2017 #24

If it annoys him MFM008 Sep 2017 #3

I think if Mar-a-Loco were destroyed it would wound him emotionally. BannonsLiver Sep 2017 #5

Exactly MFM008 Sep 2017 #11

I think there is something to that. There is a certain amount of prestige to owning these places. smirkymonkey Sep 2017 #16

For my own enjoyment, i want to see it happen. kysrsoze Sep 2017 #29

You didn't see the second part of my wish cyclonefence Sep 2017 #4

True. But he'll just go somewhere else unecessarily oppulent. JoeStuckInOH Sep 2017 #6

One step at a time... cyclonefence Sep 2017 #9

It appears you are "concerned" MontanaMama Sep 2017 #7

I'm just pointing out that people are ignorant if they think this will "hurt" Trump. JoeStuckInOH Sep 2017 #17

Or a troll. LanternWaste Sep 2017 #30

Uhhhhh. Yeah... MontanaMama Sep 2017 #41

It's not like a disaster would get him to acknowledge climate change. Orsino Sep 2017 #8

I'm just thinking more along the lines of the 6 million other people who live around Mar a Lago. Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2017 #10

But, but, but OldHippieChick Sep 2017 #12

Trump deserves plenty of hate, but we're getting close to TDS Blue_Adept Sep 2017 #13

The difference is that Trump deserves it; Obama did not. Orrex Sep 2017 #18

Right, but they're taking it to such an extreme. Blue_Adept Sep 2017 #20

I don't think an ineffectual wish possessing zero weight nor any consequence, is an extreme. LanternWaste Sep 2017 #31

Essentially, just a reminder to some, don't become that which you hate Blue_Adept Sep 2017 #21

LOL. Well... Orrex Sep 2017 #26

A lot of people are being driven to anger by him, rightly so Blue_Adept Sep 2017 #28

Ultimately, yes Orrex Sep 2017 #34

I don't think that he inflates the value of his property avebury Sep 2017 #14

I don't want Mar-a-Lago destroyed... Orrex Sep 2017 #15

One of the turn offs on this forum is the constant judging. moda253 Sep 2017 #19

Wouldn't An Inflated Property Value. . . ProfessorGAC Sep 2017 #22

I agree, it's silly Dem2 Sep 2017 #23

Not necessarily. He applied for and got FEMA money for Mar a Lago in the past. nt pnwmom Sep 2017 #25

Wishing destruction of Mar-a-lago is wishing destruction on the rest of Palm Beach county Vermijelli Sep 2017 #27

not sure about your #3 allegation. His properties are charging more than ever and are busy as heck TeamPooka Sep 2017 #32

Trump spells that out in this video @ 1:25 Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #33

Oh, I think the loss of that rococo nightmare and the beeyouteeful chocolate cake Warpy Sep 2017 #35

Human nature: Enemy bad. Crush, kill, destroy. Binkie The Clown Sep 2017 #36

Trump probably will legally launder money, with a 20 times appraised value Russian indemnity policy. TheBlackAdder Sep 2017 #37

Yep. Read something earlier about how much money he raked in when he just had minor hurricane damage Lucinda Sep 2017 #39

It's to teach him empathy. sofa king Sep 2017 #40

Personally, I think it is grotesque and shameful to wish destruction on anyone... Expecting Rain Sep 2017 #42

F Mar A Scamo XRubicon Sep 2017 #43