General Discussion

InAbLuEsTaTe

(25,516 posts)

66. Yup yup... seems only question now is: who's gonna strike first?

Sun Sep 17, 2017, 10:30 PM

Sep 2017

Two dumb-asses tryin to out wit each other... doesn't seem like a very good situation for securing a peaceful resolution.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

91 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

War with NK will be inevitable. [View all] Rustyeye77 Sep 2017 OP

What do you suggest we do? MoonRiver Sep 2017 #1

Direct talks. Rustyeye77 Sep 2017 #5

And how do we destroy their military (cause talks have failed for decades)? MoonRiver Sep 2017 #7

I really hope our military will have that answer. Rustyeye77 Sep 2017 #11

They do and certainly can.. paleotn Sep 2017 #23

This OP reminds me of the 1970s. Every gathering wound down with Hortensis Sep 2017 #40

I hope not. MoonRiver Sep 2017 #69

Their military is in very deep tunnels so that you can't destroy it jmowreader Sep 2017 #29

I doubt my friends in Seoul and Incheon would agree with you. pangaia Sep 2017 #58

Which President should begin direct talks, because we have never ever had them Not Ruth Sep 2017 #60

No flames here... I agree. The Fuhrer-in-Chief is going to get us all killed. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #2

He's going to get a lot of people killed paleotn Sep 2017 #32

Yup yup... seems only question now is: who's gonna strike first? InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #66

A conundrum for sure onlyadream Sep 2017 #81

And the really sad thing is if the west coast is lost to a nuclear attack... Initech Sep 2017 #82

What's your prediction on the number of war dead? True Dough Sep 2017 #3

There were many who said the same thing... Rustyeye77 Sep 2017 #9

You didn't answer my question... True Dough Sep 2017 #13

An awful lot. Rustyeye77 Sep 2017 #17

Are one million South Korean deaths acceptable ? DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2017 #20

Who cares, it's not like they're Americans. Mariana Sep 2017 #65

Are any North Korean deaths acceptable? Not Ruth Sep 2017 #77

Since I oppose war on the Korean Peninsula your query should be directed toward the seminal poster. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2017 #78

No Not Ruth Sep 2017 #79

What part of my statement didn't you understand or take exception to ? DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2017 #80

You appeared to only be concerned with south korean deaths Voltaire2 Sep 2017 #87

"'Whoever saves one life, it is written as if he has saved all humanity." DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2017 #88

I didn't say that True Dough Sep 2017 #24

Have we lived with such threats before? I do not agree. There are at least two big differences stevenleser Sep 2017 #48

North Korea has threatened Japan True Dough Sep 2017 #51

That doesnt address what I wrote. nt stevenleser Sep 2017 #53

Okay. Whatever. True Dough Sep 2017 #54

Yep, only America can have nukes. After all, we are only country vile enough to have used them. Hoyt Sep 2017 #46

The Chinese do NOT want North Korea to have nukes.... pangaia Sep 2017 #59

There were sixty million civilian and military deaths in WW ll DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2017 #15

And so, we should have stayed out of WWII ? Rustyeye77 Sep 2017 #19

Not after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor . DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2017 #21

OK, lets wait till the first nuke hits the West coast. Rustyeye77 Sep 2017 #28

Do you plan to volunteer Dan Sep 2017 #44

What if they did. Would that make it OK? nt stevenleser Sep 2017 #49

No, but as you get older Dan Sep 2017 #50

this bluestarone Sep 2017 #56

Or they can wait for us to invade them like we invaded Iraq because they had Hoyt Sep 2017 #47

Every expert who looks at war with North Korea says it will be horrific DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2017 #4

I'm uncomfortable with herr drumpf having nukes. greatauntoftriplets Sep 2017 #6

There are no good answers on North Korea Pope George Ringo II Sep 2017 #8

Here... DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2017 #10

OK..so we let lil Kim have nukes. Rustyeye77 Sep 2017 #14

Russia and China have nukes. Should we take them on next ? DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2017 #16

OK... obviously you believe we should Rustyeye77 Sep 2017 #22

No. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2017 #26

Yes, Eko Sep 2017 #31

jeeze give it up, sir.. pangaia Sep 2017 #62

What a fine example of the classic strawman argument Mariana Sep 2017 #68

It will be unless the Kim family is completely deposed Warpy Sep 2017 #12

I know I am going to get "yelled" at for this. Doreen Sep 2017 #18

I agree: PCIntern Sep 2017 #27

Thank You Doreen Sep 2017 #35

It's tRump, meaning nothing is as it seems. SammyWinstonJack Sep 2017 #55

How many North Korean troops are stationed on our border? Nevernose Sep 2017 #25

Some thoughts...no flame Fatemah2774 Sep 2017 #30

I am always confident the world couldn't get any MyNameGoesHere Sep 2017 #33

Would we tolerate Chinese jet fighter buzzing the Mexico-U.S border ? DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2017 #37

Ok my counter argument MyNameGoesHere Sep 2017 #43

We tolerated Soviet jets right on the edge of our airspace for decades Lee-Lee Sep 2017 #70

Beijing is five hundred miles from Pyongyang DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2017 #73

The Peoples Republic of China..does not want war...NK is kinda in China's sphere of influence.. Stuart G Sep 2017 #34

I would follow Clinton's advice. War is not inevitable. delisen Sep 2017 #36

OOPS...got to add this..the capital of China.."Beijing" .is only 400 mi from the Korean border Stuart G Sep 2017 #38

OF COURSE heaven05 Sep 2017 #39

Yes...but..think of this...North.Korea has an idiot as a leader...so do we...(in USA) Stuart G Sep 2017 #41

HRC is right heaven05 Sep 2017 #85

War with NK equals Impeachment Protection Shield NurseJackie Sep 2017 #42

NO....................it doesn't...you see, if it is totally stupid...the answer could be....no war. Stuart G Sep 2017 #45

Not with traitor Trump rockfordfile Sep 2017 #52

Obviously I'm in the minority here..and that's ok. Rustyeye77 Sep 2017 #57

Please see Post #31 DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2017 #67

Nothing is worth the lives of hundreds of thousands of civilians walkingman Sep 2017 #61

Sanctions are designed to starve North Korea Not Ruth Sep 2017 #76

Why would we impose sanctions on South Korea ? DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2017 #83

attacking NK bluestarone Sep 2017 #63

Worried about North Korea??? MFM008 Sep 2017 #64

I see two ways the NK regime ends without war with us and the ROK Lee-Lee Sep 2017 #71

In AD 2101 War Was Beginning Orrex Sep 2017 #72

Questions for the original poster DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2017 #74

We are at war with North Korea. Peace is what is inevitable, after the war. L. Coyote Sep 2017 #75

There are really no good solutions anymore...only less sh**ty ones inwiththenew Sep 2017 #84

So you think we should kill millions of people because we don't like Kim Jung Un's threats? Voltaire2 Sep 2017 #86

No... you think he should kill millions of americans ?? Rustyeye77 Sep 2017 #90

I don't think any nation should start a nuclear war. Voltaire2 Sep 2017 #91

The only way Kim can really escalate from where NK is now, is to test Calista241 Sep 2017 #89