Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
16. Actually, people need to discuss it more, instead of
Sun Sep 24, 2017, 08:01 AM
Sep 2017

shouting down any and all discussion of it by experts, and anyone who dares to question the dogma.

My experience on DU has been that cheerleading has been considered the only "disussion" of it that is considered "progressive."

As though people are frightened that this legislation won't stand the actual costs and consequences being laid out by neutral experts and calling any such analysis corrupt or "GOP TALKING POINTS!!!"

Aren't Democrats the party of facts, and data over dogma? Climate scientists over politicians, etc?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion» GOPer Joni Ernst has tow...»Reply #16