Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Autumn

(44,980 posts)
30. If the repeal doesn't pass they will use other methods to kill it. I think a rapid repeal would be
Sun Sep 24, 2017, 08:54 PM
Sep 2017

better for the Dems in the long run. Letting it collapse over a period of time allows the GOP skate on the anger of their constituents past 2018.

They have until the 30th to do it by reconciliation with a simple majority Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #1
Can't they keep doing it under the 2018 fiscal year? Kablooie Sep 2017 #4
Not by reconciliation, which requires a simple majority. They'd need 60. Ninsianna Sep 2017 #8
No, because they want to use the 2018 reconciliation for big tax cuts for their tblue37 Sep 2017 #10
Thank you for that bit of info, it's helping make more sense uppityperson Sep 2017 #13
Thank you, that makes more sense uppityperson Sep 2017 #5
Which means, they won't be able to do it. Warren DeMontague Sep 2017 #22
Can they change or abolish the reconciliation rule and then do it the way Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #27
I believe they will need 60 votes after that. Of course they can and have Hoyt Sep 2017 #2
No, but I'm not sure on the specifics myself. W_HAMILTON Sep 2017 #3
See my post #10 above. nt tblue37 Sep 2017 #11
My understanding is that they would have to pass a budget for the new fiscal year first unblock Sep 2017 #6
Can they attach elements of Trumpcare to the budget?? alfredo Sep 2017 #7
In theory yes, but that requires 60 votes. unblock Sep 2017 #9
Can they do away with the filibuster? alfredo Sep 2017 #16
yes, they could go nuclear at any point unblock Sep 2017 #17
Never use a weapon that can be used against you. alfredo Sep 2017 #18
How long did a party representing a minority of the people rule over South Africa? unblock Sep 2017 #19
A thousand year Reich alfredo Sep 2017 #20
! unblock Sep 2017 #23
I remember a Rep saying they will rule for a hundred years alfredo Sep 2017 #28
Na. They know if they go nuclear, Dems only need one good election to get enough decent Volaris Sep 2017 #24
I dunno, they're determined to hold on to power unblock Sep 2017 #26
And they want to use reconciliation for tax cuts during fiscal year 2018. nt tblue37 Sep 2017 #12
As things stand, if we don't take back the Senate . . . ATL Ebony Sep 2017 #31
I think we have a better shot at the house unblock Sep 2017 #32
If Collins, Murkowski, and McCain voted as before, against the Wealthcare bill, then... Rollo Sep 2017 #14
But how much longer will McCain be with us? Kablooie Sep 2017 #15
I wouldn't count McCain out yet... Rollo Sep 2017 #29
Wealthcare is such an appropriate name for it. nt R B Garr Sep 2017 #21
They can still rip it apart piece by piece, federally and by state. Hortensis Sep 2017 #25
If the repeal doesn't pass they will use other methods to kill it. I think a rapid repeal would be Autumn Sep 2017 #30
After Sept 30, it will no longer be a budgetary matter Warpy Sep 2017 #33
Deadline winetourdriver01 Sep 2017 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I've been told that if th...»Reply #30