Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
3. This is the kind of junk that led Australia to bite the bullet in 1996 and severely restrict guns.
Mon Oct 2, 2017, 09:59 AM
Oct 2017

Trump will encourage gunners, and Roy Moore will whip his out and fire up the deplorables. We'll do nothing, and in a decade there will be another 100 Million guns on the streets.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"Good guys with guns"... Girard442 Oct 2017 #1
Yep. Intuitively, I would not think he would be effective that far away, LuckyCharms Oct 2017 #2
A .223 round is still deadly well beyond that distance. MineralMan Oct 2017 #7
I understand. Depraved indifference is impossible for regular people to comprehend. LuckyCharms Oct 2017 #11
400 yards is well sarisataka Oct 2017 #19
Knowing the landscape there, the phrase "fish in a barrel" comes to mind. n/t CincyDem Oct 2017 #20
I put 10 of 10 in the black at 1000 meters over open sights... Wounded Bear Oct 2017 #21
In my hunting days, long ago, MineralMan Oct 2017 #23
From the 32nd floor, a golf ball hit with a 3 wood is deadly Not Ruth Oct 2017 #38
This is the kind of junk that led Australia to bite the bullet in 1996 and severely restrict guns. Hoyt Oct 2017 #3
Terror is for a political purpose... Baconator Oct 2017 #4
Not always, it's not. People terrorize other people with alarming MineralMan Oct 2017 #8
Terrorism then... Baconator Oct 2017 #12
According to NRS 202.4415, it's terrorism!!! atreides1 Oct 2017 #29
And who decided that? ck4829 Oct 2017 #13
Not every act of violence is an act of terrorism... Baconator Oct 2017 #16
From a legal perspective it is clearly defined Glassunion Oct 2017 #30
Why would anyone need this type of weapon? Cracklin Charlie Oct 2017 #5
Well, there's no good reason at all for MineralMan Oct 2017 #9
Because freedom. Or some other bullshit slogan Orrex Oct 2017 #26
No good reason at all. 3catwoman3 Oct 2017 #34
I am curious about the motive too. bdamomma Oct 2017 #6
We may never know that motive, though. MineralMan Oct 2017 #15
Why? My bet is girlfriend problems and gambling losses. SharonAnn Oct 2017 #24
I have no idea. MineralMan Oct 2017 #25
"It's a pity that such people don't shoot themselves first." 3catwoman3 Oct 2017 #36
That always occurs to me, too. MineralMan Oct 2017 #41
Plenty of people do shoot themselves, makes one wonder at the impact if they did not Not Ruth Oct 2017 #46
could be bdamomma Oct 2017 #32
What about his father? mainstreetonce Oct 2017 #27
I have no idea. MineralMan Oct 2017 #28
Apparently he was considered the least angry person in his family Not Ruth Oct 2017 #35
Yes. Apparently, he didn't share his anger and rage MineralMan Oct 2017 #39
"...the least violent in the family," is an odd thing to say. 3catwoman3 Oct 2017 #40
It's horrifying Lotusflower70 Oct 2017 #10
Random murder happens a lot here in Chicago. Children and adults dying from stray bullets. mucifer Oct 2017 #14
Yes. It happens here in the Twin Cities, too. MineralMan Oct 2017 #18
Chicago use predictive policing in the form of a strategic subject list Not Ruth Oct 2017 #45
If his wife (or companion) turns up maybe we'll know a little more FakeNoose Oct 2017 #17
the NRA bdamomma Oct 2017 #37
"...it's like they do not care." 3catwoman3 Oct 2017 #47
this report shows the trajectory Motley13 Oct 2017 #22
Go to the 32nd floor and look at the street Not Ruth Oct 2017 #31
Yes, pretty much. MineralMan Oct 2017 #33
Yes.... Adrahil Oct 2017 #42
I'm guessing that he was pissed off at all of humanity. MineralMan Oct 2017 #43
Me too. Adrahil Oct 2017 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I saw a report that said ...»Reply #3