INEXCUSABLE

[still_one]

54. It is right in the article. Here, I will post the quote from the article, and the tweet Brazille

herself wrote:

"So Brazile herself, though she obviously disapproves of the JFA, says the primaries weren’t rigged and there was no internal corruption at the DNC that favored Clinton. In something that suprises me not at all, it appears that even though Clinton had substantial authority and could have rigged things, she instead used this authority to raise lots of money; make sure the DNC hired competent people; and try to get the party apparatus working again.
In the end, then, this strikes me as almost classic Hillary: she did nothing wrong, but practically went out of her way to make it look like she was doing something slippery. I have never seen another human being do this so frequently. But, in fact, it looks like she really didn’t do anything seriously unscrupulous here, and nearly everyone agrees that, in the end, the primaries weren’t rigged in any serious way.²"

here is the tweet from Ms. Brazile herself from the article I linked:

Link to tweet

?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.motherjones.com%2Fkevin-drum%2F2017%2F11%2Fdonna-brazile-and-the-latest-great-hillary-scandal%2F

Just read down on her current tweents, and she reiterates that it wasn't rigged

https://twitter.com/donnabrazile?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.democraticunderground.com%2F%3Fcom%3Dview_post%26forum%3D1002%26pid%3D9796460