Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: INEXCUSABLE [View all]RandomAccess
(5,210 posts)55. Thanks -- but that's a "walkback" of what she didn't say to start with
She never said -- and in fact went out of her way to say the opposite, that she looked everywhere within the DNC for that kind of internal corruption and didn't find it.
She has NOT, however (to my knowledge, which is why I asked for corroboration) walked back anything about the joint agreement in the Fall of 2015, the one that this Feb 2016 article describes so well (and validates what Brazille said and more -- but you have to read the whole article):
Democratic Party fundraising effort helps Clinton find new donors, too February 20, 2016
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/democratic-party-fundraising-effort-helps-clinton-find-new-donors-too/2016/02/19/b8535cea-d68f-11e5-b195-2e29a4e13425_story.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I agree, though I have been more disappointed in others. My Trump voting brother, for example.
Squinch
Nov 2017
#1
I'm actually having a hard time with it. I know I can't have a meanigful relationship
Squinch
Nov 2017
#10
Well said. And that's good advice, and yes. The line is immovable. Regardless of who is trying to
Squinch
Nov 2017
#29
I went to a family (not mine) party last night where political talk and devices were banned
Not Ruth
Nov 2017
#77
I'd rather be bored than argue with someone who will never see reason. And using devices during
Squinch
Nov 2017
#79
According to this Mother Jones article, Donna Brazile is now backing away from those "rigged"
still_one
Nov 2017
#4
yes, and much of the media is still distorting the facts and spreading misinformation that she
still_one
Nov 2017
#35
It is right in the article. Here, I will post the quote from the article, and the tweet Brazille
still_one
Nov 2017
#54
Sorry, it isn't a walkback, she previously used the word "rigged", and in HER tweet she undid that
still_one
Nov 2017
#56
What happened is Comey 11 days before the election sent a letter to the republicans, and the
still_one
Nov 2017
#61
Unlike Brazile, Warren has yet to issue a retraction. This will not go away until she does.
SunSeeker
Nov 2017
#15
Just speaking for myself, I don't profess to know a fraction of what really goes on behind
NRaleighLiberal
Nov 2017
#49
Have not seen any comments of how all these conservative racist misogynistic assholes
TNNurse
Nov 2017
#22
I like her & don't want to impugn her character. I believe she reached an erroneous conclusion
Madam45for2923
Nov 2017
#25
I understand people that see it like you do. Just in my mind I have a slightly different opinion.
Madam45for2923
Nov 2017
#31