Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Grammy23

(5,810 posts)
31. I have no idea exactly why Schmidt turned against his own party.
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 12:12 PM
Nov 2017

Maybe it was a “come to Jesus” moment when he realized that a moral degenerate like tRump was going to be the Republican nominee last year. Maybe it was after tRump’s nomination and he saw otherwise decent people flocking to his rallies and declaring their allegiance to such a despicable man/child. But something in him recognized we were headed for a cliff in terms of morality. He looked into that abyss and recoiled in terror.

I recall very well Schmidt’s role in the 2008 debacle with McCain/Palin. And I think Schmidt probably got a morality wake up call with the mental gymnastics he had to deal with as Palin revealed her thinking or maybe it was the LACK of it that started his turn. Dealing with that ticket up close and personal probably gave him insight that we will never know about.

Whatever the reason or reasons, I will take his words today at face value. He is putting the moral dilemma out on the table and maybe forcing a few dyed in the wool Republicans to confront their own moral values. All the conflicts that tRump brought with him are today being revisited in Alabama. The people of Alabama had a chance to reject tRump in 2016 and didn’t. Maybe Schmidt’s goal is to try to stop the degradation of our country by taking a hard look at what the election of tRump brought and saying forcefully that we can pull back. We can determine that we have gone far enough and we don’t like where we are headed.

I am willing to give the man a moment of redemption. He, at least, is willing to confront his party and painfully try to lance the boil growing from within its body. I hope he is successful in causing enough people to take a cold, hard look at what they have become and to be willing to say enough. No MOORE!
Last night I heard a commentator refer to it as the "Grand Old Pedophiles." Vinca Nov 2017 #1
I prefer 'Ghoulish Old Perverts'............ LongTomH Nov 2017 #14
Greedy Old Perverts lagomorph777 Nov 2017 #17
Here's there baseball cap: L. Coyote Nov 2017 #24
A great read titaniumsalute Nov 2017 #2
You Own This Stevie Boy! ProfessorGAC Nov 2017 #3
While you are correct in what you say, he has led the fight against Trump. I would OnDoutside Nov 2017 #12
I have done a lot of thinking... dajoki Nov 2017 #19
I'll stick up for Goldwater Pope George Ringo II Nov 2017 #26
Yep - that shift in the parties was the beginning of the end Cosmocat Nov 2017 #33
Also, as long as we're talking about changes from '64 Pope George Ringo II Nov 2017 #41
Yes I agree with 1964 as the start, but I think they upped the OnDoutside Nov 2017 #34
The Master And His Minions - 1985 Marcuse Nov 2017 #21
Where's Chuckie Todd? ProfessorGAC Nov 2017 #22
Chuck Todd was 13 years old in 1985 emulatorloo Nov 2017 #36
I Know ProfessorGAC Nov 2017 #40
I agree totally. Save your outrage Schmidt, you helped make this mess. nt Irish_Dem Nov 2017 #27
I believe in redemption and atonement nt emulatorloo Nov 2017 #37
really? Republicans haven't cared about that in decades so no biggie beachbum bob Nov 2017 #4
Just figure this out, Steve? sarge43 Nov 2017 #5
He's been saying similar for a long while now. emulatorloo Nov 2017 #38
I give him credit for calling Moore a pedophile and Pence a titanic fraud and nonstop liar dalton99a Nov 2017 #6
A relevant quote from Washington's Farewell Address: Girard442 Nov 2017 #7
Well done. Your emphasis is perfectly placed. brush Nov 2017 #9
Thanks. Very current and ominous. KY_EnviroGuy Nov 2017 #10
Holy moly Washington must've had a crystal ball. lagomorph777 Nov 2017 #18
Everytime I read something from our founding fathers JDC Nov 2017 #29
k and r Achilleaze Nov 2017 #8
It exposes a profound moral rot all right. ananda Nov 2017 #11
Steve Schmidt brought moral rot to the Republican party in the era of Rove/Cheney/Bush oberliner Nov 2017 #13
Steve has done a lot of damage SHRED Nov 2017 #20
The question I would have for Steve is, if Jeb Bush had won instead OnDoutside Nov 2017 #15
"otherwise normal, decent people" hibbing Nov 2017 #16
I thought Eisenhower died. L. Coyote Nov 2017 #25
STEVE WHY ARE YOU SO SURPRISED???? infullview Nov 2017 #23
He's been saying stuff like this for at least a year. It's not a surprise to him. emulatorloo Nov 2017 #39
Is "expose" the right word? Or "makes it impossible to ignore"?... JHB Nov 2017 #28
I'm glad schmidt has always been critical of trump and continues to be JI7 Nov 2017 #30
I have no idea exactly why Schmidt turned against his own party. Grammy23 Nov 2017 #31
Every time I see Schmidt, I think of his role in poisoning our nation w Sarah Palin. Dark n Stormy Knight Nov 2017 #42
No, Steve. That rot has been hiding in plain sight for decades. GoCubsGo Nov 2017 #32
K&R... spanone Nov 2017 #35
Was it moral rot to try and turn Sarah Palin into a vice president, Steve? Volaris Nov 2017 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GOP strategist Steve Schm...»Reply #31