Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ismnotwasm

(42,674 posts)
49. Oh I have a whole essay written out on THAT
Wed Dec 6, 2017, 04:45 PM
Dec 2017

I don’t post it anywhere because it makes no difference. I’m just gonna repost, yet again, Andrea Dworkin (and wasn’t the mere mention of her name hated at DU not so many years ago)

I Want a Twenty-Four-Hour Truce
During Which There Is No Rape
1983

I have thought a great deal about how a feminist, like myself, addresses an audience primarily of political men who say that they are antisexist. And I thought a lot about whether there should be a qualitative difference in the kind of speech I address to you. And then I found myself incapable of pretending that I really believe that that qualitative difference exists. I have watched the men's movement for many years. I am close with some of the people who participate in it. I can't come here as a friend even though I might very much want to. What I would like to do is to scream: and in that scream I would have the screams of the raped, and the sobs of the battered; and even worse, in the center of that scream I would have the deafening sound of women's silence, that silence into which we are born because we are women and in which most of us die.

And if there would be a plea or a question or a human address in that scream, it would be this: why are you so slow? Why are you so slow to understand the simplest things; not the complicated ideological things. You understand those. The simple things. The cliches. Simply that women are human to precisely the degree and quality that you are.

And also: that we do not have time. We women. We don't have forever. Some of us don't have another week or another day to take time for you to discuss whatever it is that will enable you to go out into those streets and do something. We are very close to death. All women are. And we are very close to rape and we are very close to beating. And we are inside a system of humiliation from which there is no escape for us. We use statistics not to try to quantify the injuries, but to convince the world that those injuries even exist. Those statistics are not abstractions. It is easy to say, "Ah, the statistics, somebody writes them up one way and somebody writes them up another way." That's true. But I hear about the rapes one by one by one by one by one, which is also how they happen. Those statistics are not abstract to me. Every three minutes a woman is being raped. Every eighteen seconds a woman is being beaten. There is nothing abstract about it. It is happening right now as I am speaking.

And it is happening for a simple reason. There is nothing complex and difficult about the reason. Men are doing it, because of the kind of power that men have over women. That power is real, concrete, exercised from one body to another body, exercised by someone who feels he has a right to exercise it, exercised in public and exercised in private. It is the sum and substance of women's oppression.

It is not done 5000 miles away or 3000 miles away. It is done here and it is done now and it is done by the people in this room as well as by other contemporaries: our friends, our neighbors, people that we know. Women don't have to go to school to learn about power. We just have to be women, walking down the street or trying to get the housework done after having given one's body in marriage and then having no rights over it.

The power exercised by men day to day in life is power that is institutionalized. It is protected by law. It is protected by religion and religious practice. It is protected by universities, which are strongholds of male supremacy. It is protected by a police force. It is protected by those whom Shelley called "the unacknowledged legislators of the world": the poets, the artists. Against that power, we have silence.

It is an extraordinary thing to try to understand and confront why it is that men believe--and men do believe--that they have the right to rape. Men may not believe it when asked. Everybody raise your hand who believes you have the right to rape. Not too many hands will go up. It's in life that men believe they have the right to force sex, which they don't call rape. And it is an extraordinary thing to try to understand that men really believe that they have the right to hit and to hurt. And it is an equally extraordinary thing to try to understand that men really believe that they have the right to buy a woman's body for the purpose of having sex: that that is a right. And it is very amazing to try to understand that men believe that the seven-billion-dollar-a-year industry that provides men with cunts is something that men have a right to.

That is the way the power of men is manifest in real life. That is what theory about male supremacy means. It means you can rape. It means you can hit. It means you can hurt. It means you can buy and sell women. It means that there is a class of people there to provide you with what you need. You stay richer than they are, so that they have to sell you sex. Not just on street corners, but in the workplace. That's another right that you can presume to have: sexual access to any woman in your environment, when you want.

Now, the men's movement suggests that men don't want the kind of power I have just described. I've actually heard explicit whole sentences to that effect. And yet, everything is a reason not to do something about changing the fact that you do have that power.

Hiding behind guilt, that's my favorite. I love that one. Oh, it's horrible, yes, and I'm so sorry. You have the time to feel guilty. We don't have the time for you to feel guilty. Your guilt is a form of acquiescence in what continues to occur. Your guilt helps keep things the way they are.

I have heard in the last several years a great deal about the suffering of men over sexism. Of course, I have heard a great deal about the suffering of men all my life. Needless to say, I have read Hamlet. I have read King Lear. I am an educated woman. I know that men suffer. This is a new wrinkle. Implicit in the idea that this is a different kind of suffering is the claim, I think, that in part you are actually suffering because of something that you know happens to someone else. That would indeed be new.

But mostly your guilt, your suffering, reduces to: gee, we really feel so bad. Everything makes men feel so bad: what you do, what you don't do, what you want to do, what you don't want to want to do but are going to do anyway. I think most of your distress is: gee, we really feel so bad. And I'm sorry that you feel so bad--so uselessly and stupidly bad--because there is a way in which this really is your tragedy. And I don't mean because you can't cry. And I don't mean because there is no real intimacy in your lives. And I don't mean because the armor that you have to live with as men is stultifying: and I don't doubt that it is. But I don't mean any of that.

http://www.nostatusquo.com/ACLU/dworkin/WarZoneChaptIIIE.htmlI

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Another thought. It's not all men. brush Dec 2017 #1
On the first post, even. VermontKevin Dec 2017 #5
Another hit and run OP from the usual suspects... Thor_MN Dec 2017 #13
Yup. Hortensis Dec 2017 #17
I suggest women be as militant as possible. Cary Dec 2017 #34
You don't really understand rhetoric and agency, do you? Cuthbert Allgood Dec 2017 #39
I understand abuse and condescension Cary Dec 2017 #56
So you don't think any marginalized group should fight for their agency? Cuthbert Allgood Dec 2017 #59
Notice what you just did... Cary Dec 2017 #62
It isn't abuse or slimy. Cuthbert Allgood Dec 2017 #68
Stop telling me what I hear or what I think Cary Dec 2017 #69
OK. I'll talk about me. Cuthbert Allgood Dec 2017 #73
Dude, it's an anonymous internet discussion board Cary Dec 2017 #75
Hmmmmm - you seem upset. nt el_bryanto Dec 2017 #40
Of course I am upset. Cary Dec 2017 #53
So we should stop doing what is right because others aren't? Cuthbert Allgood Dec 2017 #60
It's called a coalition Cary Dec 2017 #61
I suggest women be as principled as possible, and most ARE Hortensis Dec 2017 #47
I am just one person so I don't matter Cary Dec 2017 #55
We outnumber them many times. Don't be swayed by predatory noise. Hortensis Dec 2017 #57
exactly n/t flamingdem Dec 2017 #22
Given the OP replied to the same post you did, and 40 minutes before mythology Dec 2017 #23
Given that you have no idea what I mean, I'n not sure you know what I am talking about. Thor_MN Dec 2017 #29
Yes and we are rolling over on our best Senator. Alice11111 Dec 2017 #52
Right. But it's almost all women. And most men pnwmom Dec 2017 #20
Right. People have their own lives and concerns. They're not winking an nodding as sex predators... brush Dec 2017 #35
Yep! mreilly Dec 2017 #24
All men??? Cattledog Dec 2017 #2
Not all men, all "kinds" of men. pnwmom Dec 2017 #21
Wake me up when Republicans are affected. BannonsLiver Dec 2017 #3
what aboutism? Cuthbert Allgood Dec 2017 #41
Agree. Suicide mission initiated by the RW. Alice11111 Dec 2017 #54
Well, this woman thinks it's stupid to be led around the nose by the GOP kcr Dec 2017 #4
Certainly not all men, thank you very much. Glorfindel Dec 2017 #6
If they have not participated directly loyalsister Dec 2017 #7
Wrong. What a presumptous generalization. The vast majority of men have not protected sexual... brush Dec 2017 #9
Horseshit hueymahl Dec 2017 #58
ALL men? really? NRaleighLiberal Dec 2017 #8
You are exactly right Kevin. Thanks for the post. nt Irish_Dem Dec 2017 #10
I guess handmade34 Dec 2017 #11
24 senate dems. Jesus Christ I fear what they know. VermontKevin Dec 2017 #12
IMO they don't know any more than you, that another anonymous person made allegations... brush Dec 2017 #15
It's a Dem staffer. VermontKevin Dec 2017 #16
Who then? Why the anonymity? Jesus! brush Dec 2017 #18
I'm betting the 24 Senate Dems know. VermontKevin Dec 2017 #19
It never occured to you that this just maybe part of a repug hit job? brush Dec 2017 #25
So Bernie Sanders got taken in? Warren, Gillenbrand, Harris? VermontKevin Dec 2017 #30
That's your wording, but they are getting on the bus that Franken is now under. brush Dec 2017 #37
Or I could apply Occam's Razor. VermontKevin Dec 2017 #38
Apply it to the Tweeden case and the photo of her goosing the guitarist's ass. brush Dec 2017 #42
I'm going to apply it to the Dem staffer and 24 Dems. VermontKevin Dec 2017 #44
Figures. You don't want to touch the shakiness of the Tweeden case that started it all. brush Dec 2017 #46
Credibility? Buh Bye ProfessorGAC Dec 2017 #64
If you dig deep enough and far enough back Bettie Dec 2017 #14
What nonsense mythology Dec 2017 #26
He's been trying to walk that line Bettie Dec 2017 #32
You're exactly right. No wonder they laugh and call us snowflakes. Vinca Dec 2017 #27
Russian trolls are data mining as we speak. BannonsLiver Dec 2017 #28
Exactly GaryCnf Dec 2017 #48
We have a very good friend who used the "c" word to describe a woman who was CTyankee Dec 2017 #33
Well, let's compare your list to the allegations against Franken: Cuthbert Allgood Dec 2017 #43
Very true treestar Dec 2017 #72
...and we can say goodbye Madam Mossfern Dec 2017 #31
!!! Alice11111 Dec 2017 #51
Maybe CountAllVotes Dec 2017 #36
Are you F'ing kidding GaryCnf Dec 2017 #45
Oh I have a whole essay written out on THAT ismnotwasm Dec 2017 #49
K & R Wwcd Dec 2017 #50
Fail. Iggo Dec 2017 #63
I'm sick of women and men pretending like #metoo has anything to do with touching someone's waist. OhioBlue Dec 2017 #65
i agree with you. waist touching is not groping in my opinion. trueblue2007 Dec 2017 #66
You okay with trump? StarryNite Dec 2017 #67
D'oh. L. Coyote Dec 2017 #70
If enough of them were, why is Donald in office? treestar Dec 2017 #71
They should be. Willie Pep Dec 2017 #74
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Well, Just Maybe Women Ar...»Reply #49