Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(195,689 posts)

1. No. the court hasn't given a reason. Now - reality vs. RW

Sat Dec 9, 2017, 11:03 AM

Dec 2017

In reality this is how the court should work.

The RW will go off on not just the recusal but how a Clinton appointed Judge now has the case.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Does anyone have any thoughts on why Judge recused himself from Flynn Case? [View all] rgbecker Dec 2017 OP

No. the court hasn't given a reason. Now - reality vs. RW underpants Dec 2017 #1

He May Have Been Threatened in Some Way dlk Dec 2017 #2

I am thinking mercuryblues Dec 2017 #4

That's probably the reason marylandblue Dec 2017 #6

Makes sense MaryMagdaline Dec 2017 #7

Because he is FISA court. VermontKevin Dec 2017 #5

I think its this too... Pachamama Dec 2017 #8