General Discussion

jalan48

(14,914 posts)

9. I think Gillibrand wants to run for President and being a strong advocate (zero tolerance ) for

Reply to ProudLib72 (Original post)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 06:55 PM

Dec 2017

women sounds much better than being a strong advocate for big tobacco.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

56 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

My Theory: Franken Was A VERY Expensive Trial Balloon [View all] ProudLib72 Dec 2017 OP

I know I'm over her before she even started..nt monmouth4 Dec 2017 #1

I think that "non"-trial balloon went over like a Led Zeppelin. InAbLuEsTaTe Dec 2017 #2

NOOOOOOOOO!!!!! ProudLib72 Dec 2017 #5

hahahaha! okay! InAbLuEsTaTe Dec 2017 #20

Just a reminder... women, especially white women voted for Trump. Agschmid Dec 2017 #3

That may have been true for HRC ProudLib72 Dec 2017 #11

Republican women are first and foremost Republicans Sen. Walter Sobchak Dec 2017 #19

I must be missing something here ProudLib72 Dec 2017 #22

"progressive women" who wouldn't vote for Hillary Clinton Sen. Walter Sobchak Dec 2017 #23

Which is part of the reason why ProudLib72 Dec 2017 #24

I had plenty of issues with octoberlib Dec 2017 #46

I'm learning more about her every day ProudLib72 Dec 2017 #47

Yes! We have a winner here. nt jrthin Dec 2017 #14

Good point! InAbLuEsTaTe Dec 2017 #21

It was a trial buffoon. And I don't mean Al Franken. nt Xipe Totec Dec 2017 #4

No. It was about idiots wanting to look pure thinking it would help their career JI7 Dec 2017 #6

yup Champion Jack Dec 2017 #34

They should have gone after trump for sexual harassment instead. Kittycow Dec 2017 #7

Huh. I hadn't thought of that leftstreet Dec 2017 #8

I think Gillibrand wants to run for President and being a strong advocate (zero tolerance ) for jalan48 Dec 2017 #9

It wasn't the best possible decision and zero tolerance doesn't work. octoberlib Dec 2017 #10

I agree ProudLib72 Dec 2017 #15

Zero tolerance generally results in dflprincess Dec 2017 #31

It was utter foolishness and the worst possible decision. Binkie The Clown Dec 2017 #12

Not only stand up to Rs but also really knew how to question people in judiciary committee hearings Amaryllis Dec 2017 #26

I'm afraid I think that's a truly bizarre idea. Hortensis Dec 2017 #13

No ProudLib72 Dec 2017 #16

Ugh. Count this woman out flamingdem Dec 2017 #17

In the past Franken has stood with Gillibrand and her efforts dflprincess Dec 2017 #32

Agree with you flamingdem Dec 2017 #37

I fear it will trigger a backlash. ariadne0614 Dec 2017 #18

I read that story earlier today customerserviceguy Dec 2017 #30

?All of the allegations suegeo Dec 2017 #25

Not in this lifetime. Demsrule86 Dec 2017 #27

+1 bagelsforbreakfast Dec 2017 #28

Thank you. Demsrule86 Dec 2017 #40

Yup. dflprincess Dec 2017 #33

This is not a minor disagreement on policy...this is a denying a fellow Democrat due process to Demsrule86 Dec 2017 #39

I agree completely. Nt dflprincess Dec 2017 #42

I 100% agree that denying due process is what is unacceptable about what was done here. n/t. airplaneman Dec 2017 #43

If the Democratic Party customerserviceguy Dec 2017 #29

I think you misunderstood me a little ProudLib72 Dec 2017 #35

If there was anything to this that would be one thing... so why did they fall for an obvious GOP Demsrule86 Dec 2017 #41

You mean, setting aside every possible explanation ProudLib72 Dec 2017 #45

Nah, the accusations are sketchy at best. Gillibrand fell for an obvious repug hit job. brush Dec 2017 #36

"...best possible decision in light of all the allegations? " Are you freaking kidding? bitterross Dec 2017 #38

That was ProudLib72 Dec 2017 #44

I think it shows the folly of allowing one issue advocates to dominate the discussion. It's OnDoutside Dec 2017 #48

Definitely YES ProudLib72 Dec 2017 #49

I think Gillibrand and/or Klobuchar are going to be in the field in 2020 Algernon Moncrieff Dec 2017 #50

On the contrary rather than Reps having "the dirt" on Franken, quite a lot OnDoutside Dec 2017 #53

Franken already had issues in that regard, though Algernon Moncrieff Dec 2017 #55

that's kinda what I am thinking too gopiscrap Dec 2017 #51

best possible decision 110liberal Dec 2017 #52

what, more 3D chess? Locrian Dec 2017 #54

Would you believe tic tac toe? nt ProudLib72 Dec 2017 #56