Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

demmiblue

(39,497 posts)

7. No shit.

Reply to Name removed (Original post)

Tue Dec 12, 2017, 02:15 PM

Dec 2017

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Message auto-removed [View all] Name removed Dec 2017 OP

Please, alert us when you do. VermontKevin Dec 2017 #1

Post removed Post removed Dec 2017 #20

I didn't say you were "sexist" I merely pointed out that your promise in the OP is unfulfilled. VermontKevin Dec 2017 #25

Actually, I can do anything I want and not be sexist. Iggo Dec 2017 #2

Especially now that you received the seminal poster's permission. DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2017 #12

Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2017 #21

Welcome back! Scurrilous Dec 2017 #3

Your oppression is both noted and allowed all the credibility it is in fact, due. LanternWaste Dec 2017 #4

The seminal poster's remarks were cryptic. What "did she do" ? DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2017 #10

Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2017 #24

Yep. Here on DU the default assumption of any criticism PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2017 #5

I too, would construct a conclusion lacking any substantiation to buttress it. LanternWaste Dec 2017 #11

bravo jodymarie aimee Dec 2017 #22

An admonition for "man-bashing"! Codeine Dec 2017 #6

Or better, where did it come from? Renew Deal Dec 2017 #15

No shit. demmiblue Dec 2017 #7

Also, men-bashing. demmiblue Dec 2017 #8

I'm all for Gillibrand serving another term or two as a N.Y. senator. nt oasis Dec 2017 #9

I second that, oasis. kstewart33 Dec 2017 #37

Your concern is duly noted. nt Xipe Totec Dec 2017 #13

While I can agree with your topic headline Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2017 #14

I HAVE HAD IT WITH MEN! Skittles Dec 2017 #18

*snort!* nolabear Dec 2017 #27

Won't somebody please think of the poor men. MrsCoffee Dec 2017 #16

Yep. Thinking people can process nuance. BannonsLiver Dec 2017 #17

Of course it's possible. More so for individuals than those who Hortensis Dec 2017 #19

OP states "Regularly scheduled Men-Bashing"? Really? DUers, why is this being tolerated? hlthe2b Dec 2017 #23

Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2017 #26

"we who criticize Gillibrand are sexist by default" Link? Nt MikeydaDog Dec 2017 #29

More importantly, why wasn't I given the schedule?! Codeine Dec 2017 #35

Men bashing may have been a poor choice of words standingtall Dec 2017 #28

If other guys decide to not vote for us for standing up for women mythology Dec 2017 #30

It will not be view as simply stand up for women standingtall Dec 2017 #34

Maybe someone else could have written that tweet & that might be true, Motley13 Dec 2017 #31

Yeah? ismnotwasm Dec 2017 #32

At least you can claim that nt Progressive dog Dec 2017 #33

yes, but you can't be pro-sexual harassment without being sexist, usually anyway. nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2017 #36

You had me with your subject line BUT Duppers Dec 2017 #38

I want Franken back and I'm STILL PISSED flamingdem Dec 2017 #39