Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Federal judge dismisses Nebraskan's suit against all homosexuals [View all]The Velveteen Ocelot
(131,989 posts)28. Here's the full opinion - short but sweet.
http://abovethelaw.com/2015/05/surprisingly-lawsuit-against-all-homosexuals-summarily-dismissed/2/
And for another good chuckle, have a look at Mayo v. Satan, cited in the Driskell opinion. http://kevinunderhill.typepad.com/Documents/Mayo_v_Satan.pdf
My all-time favorite, though, is Searight v. New Jersey, 412 F. Supp. 413 (D. N.J. 1976): http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14840990769950902726&q=412+f+supp+413&hl=en&as_sdt=2006 which was the subject of great hilarity when I was in law school. In that case the plaintiff claimed the State of New Jersey "unlawfully injected him in the left eye with a radium electric beam. As a result, he claims that someone now talks to him on the inside of his brain." The court dismissed the case, but offered some helpful suggestions:
And for another good chuckle, have a look at Mayo v. Satan, cited in the Driskell opinion. http://kevinunderhill.typepad.com/Documents/Mayo_v_Satan.pdf
My all-time favorite, though, is Searight v. New Jersey, 412 F. Supp. 413 (D. N.J. 1976): http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14840990769950902726&q=412+f+supp+413&hl=en&as_sdt=2006 which was the subject of great hilarity when I was in law school. In that case the plaintiff claimed the State of New Jersey "unlawfully injected him in the left eye with a radium electric beam. As a result, he claims that someone now talks to him on the inside of his brain." The court dismissed the case, but offered some helpful suggestions:
The allegations, of course, are of facts which, if they exist, are not yet known to man. Just as Mr. Houdini has so far failed to establish communication from the spirit world (See E. L. Doctorow, "Ragtime", pp. 166-169, Random House, 1974), so the decades of scientific experiments and statistical analysis have failed to establish the existence of "extrasensory perception" (ESP). But, taking the facts as pleaded, and assuming them to be true, they show a case of presumably unlicensed radio communication, a matter which comes within the sole jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission, 47 U.S.C. § 151, et seq. And even aside from that, Searight could have blocked the broadcast to the antenna in his brain simply by grounding it. See, for example, Ghirardi, "Modern Radio Servicing", First Edition, p. 572, ff. (Radio & Technical Publishing Co., New York, 1935). Just as delivery trucks for oil and gasoline are "grounded" against the accumulation of charges of static electricity, so on the same principle Searight might have pinned to the back of a trouser leg a short chain of paper clips so that the end would touch the ground and prevent anyone from talking to him inside his brain.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No Hobby Lobby in my area. And if there was, I wouldn't set foot in the place.
Elmer S. E. Dump
May 2015
#18
In ALL seriousness, this was a way for this particular insane person to vent.
NoJusticeNoPeace
May 2015
#5
next time i go on about my belief in unicorns and people laugh at me. i'll use your line. nt
La Lioness Priyanka
May 2015
#31
Went out of may to NOT lump all in, that you choose to ignore that is not my problem
NoJusticeNoPeace
May 2015
#25
you lump all of those who believe passionately or even think a God or gods is possible,
AlbertCat
May 2015
#32
i dont think religious people have mental issues, i do think fundamentalists do. nt
La Lioness Priyanka
May 2015
#33