Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stuckinthebush

(10,841 posts)
18. Why would you say it is not "scientific"?
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 03:28 PM
Aug 2015

I see DUers say this a lot and that's inaccurate.

A survey sample of 536 has a margin of error of around 4.2
A survey sample of 1000 has a margin of error of around 3.1
A survey sample of around 1500 has a margin of error of around 2.5

So, with a sample of 536 if you took 100 separate samples then the overall percentage of people responding the same way would be within 4.2% of the reported results in 95 of these.

The margin of error is a little bigger for a sample of 536 than 1500 but it has nothing to do with being scientific. It has to do with probability. HOW they sample (methodology) would speak to the issue of how "scientific" the poll is. If the methodology is sound then a sample size of 536 can result in illustrative results.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Poll Watch: Rasmussen (R)...»Reply #18