Latest Breaking News

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)

99. Yes, they do. Not NEARLY as good as they looked for Hillary Clinton in 2007, but still quite good

Reply to DCBob (Reply #87)

Fri Nov 20, 2015, 03:06 PM

Nov 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

128 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bernie Sanders Reaches New High in Support: Poll [View all] Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 OP

Second debate bump? He did do well. Hortensis Nov 2015 #1

The gap is narrowing! Helen Borg Nov 2015 #2

Let's look at the gap... brooklynite Nov 2015 #3

niiiiiiiiine ellllllven azurnoir Nov 2015 #7

Gaps before Biden decides against running = 45%, 22%, 24%, 12%, 14%. Gaps after Biden = 20%, 16% Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #8

Biden withdrew on October 21, Webb withdrew on October 20.... George II Nov 2015 #40

That was the sympathy reaction to the Benghazi hearings that gave Hillary a boost. JDPriestly Nov 2015 #58

If it was a "sympathy reaction", why did Sanders' number go down as well as hers up? George II Nov 2015 #80

The asterisks for the withdrawal of Biden and Webb are missing from your numbers. JDPriestly Nov 2015 #90

Thanks - I originally had all the events lumped together, then broke them up around the dates.... George II Nov 2015 #92

As I explained in another post, the polls do not measure the enthusiasm that makes the difference. JDPriestly Nov 2015 #93

Opps liberal N proud Nov 2015 #26

Clinton got a sympathy boost after the Benghazi hearing, and now we are back to Bernie JDPriestly Nov 2015 #56

True! Duval Nov 2015 #63

A Sanders win Helen Borg Nov 2015 #127

Yup, it just keeps narrowing. Nitram Nov 2015 #126

At this rate, he will catch up with Hillary two years after she wins Iowa in 10 weeks. nt onehandle Nov 2015 #4

yup, just like Obama in '08 corkhead Nov 2015 #9

There is no Obama, this time around. nt onehandle Nov 2015 #11

Sadly there's no FDR either. corkhead Nov 2015 #12

'08 didn't have any Bernie Sanders, either... tex-wyo-dem Nov 2015 #35

Yes it did. OilemFirchen Nov 2015 #50

Kuch was my first choice in '08... tex-wyo-dem Nov 2015 #64

Ex post facto. OilemFirchen Nov 2015 #69

No it didn't. Bubzer Nov 2015 #65

Not to fear, there is still a Hillary. n/t A Simple Game Nov 2015 #71

Q: Who said �Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it�? A: Not Hillary Clinton Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #14

Oopf! NurseJackie Nov 2015 #46

Based on that growth, he'll be at 45% after Super Tuesday...still behind. brooklynite Nov 2015 #5

I try to ignore these unnecessary barbs, ejbr Nov 2015 #18

I'm not trying to convince you at all... brooklynite Nov 2015 #23

But Clinton is consistantly not preferred on DU That Guy 888 Nov 2015 #25

Clinton is also consistently not prefered with liberal pundits. But media and GOP pundits love her. Bubzer Nov 2015 #48

Well to be fair, Stephanie Miller does support Hillary That Guy 888 Nov 2015 #57

Really? Last time listened to her show, she was heavily talking up Bernie sanders. Bubzer Nov 2015 #61

I think she was trying to make amends with Bernie Sanders supporters That Guy 888 Nov 2015 #77

The Brunch with Bernie segments seem to be happening infrequently now... which is understandable. Bubzer Nov 2015 #88

And yet, when I go out and talk to voters as I campaign for Bernie, I see no enthusiastic JDPriestly Nov 2015 #62

In that case, you have nothing to worry about... brooklynite Nov 2015 #74

Again ejbr Nov 2015 #73

Ah, to live in a linear world... tex-wyo-dem Nov 2015 #36

But if he gains, it is likely that she will lose an equal amount. So . . . . . . JDPriestly Nov 2015 #59

Hey, 18-29... Earth_First Nov 2015 #6

while it good i don't live by polls Robbins Nov 2015 #10

I never focus on one poll...I look at the trend line brooklynite Nov 2015 #13

Clinton's polling trend line looks worse than it did in 2007; Sanders' looks better than Obama 2007. Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #15

Take a close look at the chart... brooklynite Nov 2015 #16

This message was self-deleted by its author tex-wyo-dem Nov 2015 #38

As has been pointed out, Sanders does not have the resources of Barack Obama... brooklynite Nov 2015 #39

A more valid argument is Hillary has paid for numerous polls, so of course they will favor her. Bubzer Nov 2015 #54

Good point Buzber... tex-wyo-dem Nov 2015 #66

I self deleted the last post, but the meme... tex-wyo-dem Nov 2015 #55

I don't care what polls say Shadowflash Nov 2015 #17

Agreed. I'm thrilled to vote Sanders in the primary. I hope I get the chance to vote Sanders in the Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #20

Post removed Post removed Nov 2015 #34

this. navarth Nov 2015 #22

Agreed. Shadowflash Nov 2015 #27

What does True Blue mean? okasha Nov 2015 #67

In my experience it has meant this: navarth Nov 2015 #70

Like I said, an advertising slogan. okasha Nov 2015 #75

Ah I see. navarth Nov 2015 #91

Odd, though, that one of those slogans okasha Nov 2015 #98

Sorry, I didn't quite follow what you said. navarth Nov 2015 #100

Exactly my own position Trajan Nov 2015 #28

HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Nov 2015 #19

So, what is shows is no statistically significant change from 10-13-15 til now Tarc Nov 2015 #21

Nice try! It suggests Sanders eclipsed the huge bump Clinton got when Biden decided against running Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #24

How does one "eclipse" something by remaining stagnant? Tarc Nov 2015 #29

Bernie up 3% points in two weeks .. Clinton is down 1% Trajan Nov 2015 #30

I don't mean to sound snarky, but Tarc Nov 2015 #31

If you wanna go with feeling over math, be my guest Tarc Nov 2015 #32

That's ok ... Get it out .... Trajan Nov 2015 #33

Trajan, you sound petulant and defensive. Nitram Nov 2015 #44

Bernie can't lose! Powers Hapgood Nov 2015 #37

You heard it here first folks... brooklynite Nov 2015 #41

I hope you read my post carefully. Powers Hapgood Nov 2015 #72

He's doing better than Obama was at this point. fbc Nov 2015 #42

Let me get this straight. Do polls matter or not? Nitram Nov 2015 #43

they may still be flawed Robbins Nov 2015 #49

But if he wins, this means the Bernistas are right. immoderate Nov 2015 #101

If Nitram Nov 2015 #107

This can't be true coyote Nov 2015 #45

Right here, Coyote. Nitram Nov 2015 #51

Where are Clinton's numbers dropping? brooklynite Nov 2015 #53

A bit of wisdom . . . Powers Hapgood Nov 2015 #76

Woot! K&R & Huzza! -nt- 99th_Monkey Nov 2015 #47

I got a purty color picture of all the polls. yallerdawg Nov 2015 #52

You should add "Blue/Green stripe" - Even. DCBob Nov 2015 #81

Both of the recent changes could just be noise karynnj Nov 2015 #60

Any single data point might be just "noise," but Clinton consistently polled in the upper 60s for Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #79

Both those graphs show things looking good for Hillary. DCBob Nov 2015 #87

Yes, they do. Not NEARLY as good as they looked for Hillary Clinton in 2007, but still quite good Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #99

Wow, some of you guys are really banking on history repeating itself. DCBob Nov 2015 #102

Not at all. I fear history is repeating itself. Clinton's the front-runner; Sanders the underdog. Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #103

Of course Hillary didn't lose the general election.. she wasnt in it. There is no history there. DCBob Nov 2015 #104

No she didn't lose the general election because her collapse came just in time for us to nominate Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #105

Now you are making up history. DCBob Nov 2015 #112

She folded like a cheap card table, but feel free to spin whatever revisionist tales you want to Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #114

Its a fact, if not for the caucus states she would have won. DCBob Nov 2015 #116

So ... "but for the democratic process, she would have been crowned in 2008?" But for Ronald Reagan Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #117

So... as i said she nearly won. DCBob Nov 2015 #118

Rick Santorum keeps saying that, too. Literally, if you were doomed to listen to his stump speeches, Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #120

Here's something to refresh your memory.. DCBob Nov 2015 #121

The Santorum campaign hands out similar graphs Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #122

Now you are totally not making any sense. DCBob Nov 2015 #123

This message was self-deleted by its author DCBob Nov 2015 #119

What???!!! Too Old For B.S. Nov 2015 #68

People get more conservative as they get older I guess. fbc Nov 2015 #84

Yes, but.... Too Old For B.S. Nov 2015 #113

Because she's one of us in a pantsuit. Nitram Nov 2015 #95

Consider that Bernie is the first feasible candidate in generations who is not a Reaganite. immoderate Nov 2015 #109

Kerry was a Reaganite? Gore? Jerry Brown? George McGovern? Ted Kennedy? Nitram Nov 2015 #124

You got me. But it's close. McGovern is timed out of there. But was he feasible? (Really loved him.) immoderate Nov 2015 #128

Well.... Too Old For B.S. Nov 2015 #115

There you go again. Nitram Nov 2015 #125

It's happening fbc Nov 2015 #78

yes, steady progress for Hillary -- Sept 17 to Nov 15: Clinton +8 Sanders +4 DCBob Nov 2015 #82

And, since April, Hillary down 1 point, Sanders up 28 points fbc Nov 2015 #83

Hillary is showing amazing consistency at around 50%. DCBob Nov 2015 #85

But can 50% be maintained once the elections start? fbc Nov 2015 #86

Well, yes but Iowa looks like a big win for Hillary.. unless you think the polls are bogus. DCBob Nov 2015 #89

Amazing how far you can go up when you start so low... Nitram Nov 2015 #96

Just 2 months from now. Major Hogwash Nov 2015 #94

May the best candidate win! Nitram Nov 2015 #97

good news, and still plenty of time to close the gap. nt restorefreedom Nov 2015 #106

Definitely plenty of time. In past primaries, they lead has flipped back and forth multiple times in Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #108

Funny how it's not happening this time... brooklynite Nov 2015 #110

Usually happens in December or January or February. Be patient, grasshopper, and watch it unfold Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #111