Latest Breaking News

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)

46. It's just another indication that she favors corporations.

Mon Nov 30, 2015, 02:56 PM

Nov 2015

Hillary Clinton is a strong proponent of fracking. While working for the taxpayers as Secretary of State, she used her office as Sec of State to convince foreign governments to begin or increase their use of fracking in spite of the protesting peoples in those countries.

“Clinton urged Bulgarian officials to give fracking another chance. According to Borissov, she agreed to help fly in the "best specialists on these new technologies to present the benefits to the Bulgarian people." But resistance only grew. The following month in neighboring Romania, thousands of people gathered to protest another Chevron fracking project, and Romania's parliament began weighing its own shale gas moratorium. Again Clinton intervened, dispatching her special envoy for energy in Eurasia, Richard Morningstar, to push back against the fracking bans.” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/22/global-protests-fracking-globalfrackdown_n_1905034.html

Time and again she sides with corporations over People.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

58 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Post removed [View all] Post removed Nov 2015 OP

faux news, my god randys1 Nov 2015 #1

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2015 #2

The link is to RealClearPolitics.com, which claims its source is AP. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #20

The ethics of the matter will be decided by the voters after a huge barrage, a JDPriestly Nov 2015 #58

There seems to be a spate of opinion pieces being posted in LBN this morning. George II Nov 2015 #3

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2015 #6

This message was self-deleted by its author George II Nov 2015 #8

Reporting of facts does not magically become opinion just because you don't like the facts Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #12

But reporting "facts" from several years ago doesn't constitute LATEST BREAKING NEWS, either. George II Nov 2015 #22

When the news story is just now breaking it does Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #50

It's not news, it's opinion. They only thing RCP got from the AP was the number of contacts. Fla Dem Nov 2015 #56

Well, if you report the facts in a way that implies unethical behavior William Seger Nov 2015 #26

Does speculation work in the court room? Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #38

We instruct juries "A fact is established by circumstantial evidence when it may be fairly and Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #51

Good. 840high Nov 2015 #16

The story is available at many outlets. former9thward Nov 2015 #7

It is the OP that can't "deal with the message." SunSeeker Nov 2015 #35

You do get points for nailing the #1 response slot, but your response is not even a nice try. nm rhett o rick Nov 2015 #21

Ted CRuz and Rubio and Trump LOVE it when so called Democrats attack their own randys1 Nov 2015 #27

The Progressive Wing recognizes that 8 more years of Conservative rule will not rhett o rick Nov 2015 #29

You are talking about Obama? Conservative? Seriously? We should be so lucky to have another Laser102 Nov 2015 #54

I do think she is a corporate Democrat, but who trusts FOX news??? TryLogic Nov 2015 #4

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2015 #5

ANYthing to destroy her, now who benefits if the MAIN democratic candidate is destroyed? randys1 Nov 2015 #11

America benefits. 840high Nov 2015 #18

You seem to be referring to the main 1% candidate. The main candidate for the People is rhett o rick Nov 2015 #30

No, she is the main candidate as to poll numbers. As a mature Bernie supporter and mature randys1 Nov 2015 #33

I neither trust nor care what the polls say. I will fight against the corporate domination of our rhett o rick Nov 2015 #34

It's AP 840high Nov 2015 #17

What does that have to do with anything? nm rhett o rick Nov 2015 #25

Holy shit! What a find!!! This is.... Darb Nov 2015 #9

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2015 #10

No, you misunderstand. Darb Nov 2015 #13

You forgot to provide an argument to make your case, if you have one. nm rhett o rick Nov 2015 #31

Of course she would... SoapBox Nov 2015 #14

Examples of outrageous corruption Pantagruelsmember Nov 2015 #15

It was very sneaky of her to put these meetings / calls on her formal calendar. JoePhilly Nov 2015 #19

You fail to explain how this isn't important. This is just more evidence that she is a rhett o rick Nov 2015 #32

It is part of her job to negotiate trade. This means working both with pnwmom Nov 2015 #41

It's just another indication that she favors corporations. rhett o rick Nov 2015 #46

She worked with corporations. And she carried out Obama's policy pnwmom Nov 2015 #49

Oh no no ... its HUGE!!!! JoePhilly Nov 2015 #42

Again and again, no substance. nm rhett o rick Nov 2015 #44

Yea, these OPs are kind of lame. JoePhilly Nov 2015 #45

Then they should be easy to refute instead of the stuff you respond with. rhett o rick Nov 2015 #47

I'll help you ... JoePhilly Nov 2015 #48

Crossing the line between public and private sector has caused Baitball Blogger Nov 2015 #23

"The AP found no evidence of legal or ethical conflicts in Clinton's meetings." SunSeeker Nov 2015 #24

She represents big corporations no matter how you try to spin it. But I bet you don't rhett o rick Nov 2015 #36

No, Hillary represents me. The author of this story is spinning a nonstory to sound nefarious. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #39

"The AP found no evidence of legal or ethical conflicts in Clinton's meetings, in its examination of pampango Nov 2015 #28

No matter how you spin it, she is a major player in the corrupt government Establishment rhett o rick Nov 2015 #37

Horrors! She was doing part of her job! pnwmom Nov 2015 #40

It gets rather silly around here doesn't it. JoePhilly Nov 2015 #43

Really... Wake me up after Super Tuesday please... winstars Nov 2015 #52

Ya think? leftofcool Nov 2015 #53

Regarding the Shanghai Expo, the U.S. almost did not exhibit due to lack of funding. Beacool Nov 2015 #55

Ugh. So slimy... AzDar Nov 2015 #57