Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
34. From your link:
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 09:24 PM
Dec 2015
To sum up, some hacker or group of hackers noticed an existing backdoor in the Juniper software, which may have been intentional or unintentional -- you be the judge! They then piggybacked on top of it to build a backdoor of their own, something they were able to do because all of the hard work had already been done for them. The end result was a period in which someone -- maybe a foreign government -- was able to decrypt Juniper traffic in the U.S. and around the world.

And all because Juniper had already paved the road.

So why does this matter?

For the past several months I've been running around with various groups of technologists, doing everything I can to convince important people that the sky is falling. Or rather, that the sky will fall if they act on some of the very bad, terrible ideas that are currently bouncing around Washington -- namely, that our encryption systems should come equipped with "backdoors" intended to allow law enforcement and national security agencies to access our communications.

One of the most serious concerns we raise during these meetings is the possibility that encryption backdoors could be subverted. Specifically, that a backdoor intended for law enforcement could somehow become a backdoor for people who we don't trust to read our messages. Normally when we talk about this, we're concerned about failures in storage of things like escrow keys. What this Juniper vulnerability illustrates is that the danger is much broader and more serious than that.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

US should be able to bypass encryption—but only for terrorists, candidate says. Ichingcarpenter Dec 2015 #1
I thought only GOOD GUYS could get the backdoors open. Pholus Dec 2015 #2
Only if they give you a reach around jberryhill Dec 2015 #8
K&R to keep this visible. Nihil Dec 2015 #3
Corporate Spying, too... IthinkThereforeIAM Dec 2015 #4
If Juniper's VPNs are compromised, for compatibility Downwinder Dec 2015 #5
In my experience , no... PosterChild Dec 2015 #9
I was thinking of compatibility with other router brands. Downwinder Dec 2015 #10
But how will our government keep us safe if they can't read our mail or listen in on our phones??? hunter Dec 2015 #6
For all we know, Snowden could have told the Russians about the backdoor Blue_Tires Dec 2015 #19
Spy vs. Spy games are disgusting. hunter Dec 2015 #20
Search and seizure is a legitimate and necessary . ... PosterChild Dec 2015 #28
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2015 #7
The only evidence offered that.., PosterChild Dec 2015 #11
And your opinion is based on what? Ichingcarpenter Dec 2015 #12
I don't think I offered an opinion... PosterChild Dec 2015 #13
Ralf-Philipp Weinmann scholarly articles Ichingcarpenter Dec 2015 #15
Those are great sources.... PosterChild Dec 2015 #17
HEARTBLEED proves that the NSA simply isn't doing its job. joshcryer Dec 2015 #14
Snowden showed how bad the NSA is Ichingcarpenter Dec 2015 #16
The NSAs responsiibity is signals intelligence, not... PosterChild Dec 2015 #18
Ummm....and "Information Assurance." Pholus Dec 2015 #21
Thanks. I'll look through the links you provided. However.... PosterChild Dec 2015 #23
I looked at the security week link.... PosterChild Dec 2015 #24
I checked out the NSA mission statement concerning... PosterChild Dec 2015 #25
wget sure did.... Pholus Dec 2015 #29
Im not sure what you are referring to. You'll have to... PosterChild Dec 2015 #31
Looked at the slash dot eeport on the secure Linux open source project.... PosterChild Dec 2015 #27
The solution for openSSL is switching to libreSSL.... JonLeibowitz Dec 2015 #26
if they attack .... PosterChild Dec 2015 #30
I know company who switched from Cisco to juniper,, benld74 Dec 2015 #22
For a better, no-bullshit analysis, READ: Blue_Tires Dec 2015 #32
From your link: friendly_iconoclast Dec 2015 #34
Anyone remember INSLAW/Promis? Octafish Dec 2015 #33
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Researchers Solve Juniper...»Reply #34