Latest Breaking News

litlbilly

(2,227 posts)

48. too bad Bernie has more deligates and is within .03, guess who's really gonna win

Reply to onehandle (Original post)

Mon Feb 1, 2016, 11:51 PM

Feb 2016

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

107 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] onehandle Feb 2016 OP

And no one else yet.... ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2016 #1

I am not sure I would believe it humbled_opinion Feb 2016 #31

at 0.4% now the dif roguevalley Feb 2016 #37

K&R! stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #2

Bit premature with the delegate count tied at 19, no? fbc Feb 2016 #3

She is counting the 5 or 6 Super Delegates... Tommymac Feb 2016 #65

One small state election will not destroy the Dem party. pnwmom Feb 2016 #100

Read it slower Lage Nom Ai Feb 2016 #102

NV, 2008: Hillary won the most votes. Obama won the most delegates. pnwmom Feb 2016 #104

yep thats hillary votes not counted but the arrogant egomaniac already declaring victory bowens43 Feb 2016 #4

From your lips........ 7962 Feb 2016 #6

I am guessing because your MyNameGoesHere Feb 2016 #11

in conjunction to her actions, not so much roguevalley Feb 2016 #40

She is a flawed MyNameGoesHere Feb 2016 #96

I just heard her speak and all I heard was "I' fifteen hundred times. No we, just I. roguevalley Feb 2016 #101

+10000. I can't believe people on a site like this would support her. TPP, Wallstreet, war and all. trillion Feb 2016 #107

Because it's her time RoccoR5955 Feb 2016 #23

Good gawd man, get a grip. Darb Feb 2016 #32

True. SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #46

Could you explain why such intensity? Darb Feb 2016 #52

Too late for me to do supporting research now. SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #60

I'll just take your word for it, that you've got more Darb Feb 2016 #63

Well, I did think saying she and an R were OK, SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #72

OK Darb Feb 2016 #75

Good God. Of course not. I just hope for better. nt SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #78

It's true! She did say this about McCain and Obama. And we know that the Clintons are friends Liberal_Stalwart71 Feb 2016 #94

I don't doubt she said it. It just doesn't reach the level of "intensely" for me. Darb Feb 2016 #99

because santafe52 Feb 2016 #54

This is why jmowreader Feb 2016 #66

I've been driven to her by people like you. JohnnyRingo Feb 2016 #92

Desperation Sets In! mckara Feb 2016 #5

Yeee haaaa! Blue State Bandit Feb 2016 #7

Saw that with an 11 vote difference. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2016 #8

Now just 7 7962 Feb 2016 #14

Saw that. This is hilarious. This isn't "winner take all" either. It's a TIE. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2016 #17

Yes, and she's been projected to win from the start, right? 7962 Feb 2016 #35

I wouldn't even say that. Let her arrogance send it's own message. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2016 #70

OK, that's hilarious. SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #29

It's bullshit. There are still tons of precincts to count, many large precincts that are pro-Bernie StrictlyRockers Feb 2016 #9

+1,000 !!! CountAllVotes Feb 2016 #16

Yeah, I'm confused- Repubs have 10's of thousands of votes, but Dems barely 1k? N/t Fiendish Thingy Feb 2016 #21

those are not votes Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #30

Well, what are they? Fiendish Thingy Feb 2016 #36

delegate counts Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #39

Iowa has over a thousand delegates to the convention? Fiendish Thingy Feb 2016 #43

1681 delegates who go on to the next level. n/t JimDandy Feb 2016 #56

Then why does the graphic in post# 3 show delegates split at 19 each? N/t Fiendish Thingy Feb 2016 #61

I believe they are projecting out for the Dems National Convention JimDandy Feb 2016 #77

Thank You. Is there any data on actual turnout? Fiendish Thingy Feb 2016 #89

No and it's a little odd that they aren't releasing turnout numbers JimDandy Feb 2016 #95

The larger precincts, with heavy Sanders support, have yet to report! LongTomH Feb 2016 #10

Still almost 15% to go! CountAllVotes Feb 2016 #19

10:51 greiner3 Feb 2016 #51

So the counting isnt done, 50/49, and they declare victory? 7962 Feb 2016 #12

In other news Hillary just declared herself President. ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2016 #13

K&R! stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #15

84% in 8 votes between them. still too close to call. nt Javaman Feb 2016 #18

+1,000 !!! CountAllVotes Feb 2016 #20

Hey, that's just according to us peons.... nt SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #34

Thanks to using McCarthyist red-baiting. Odin2005 Feb 2016 #22

86% in they are separated by 7 votes. nt Javaman Feb 2016 #24

87% in. still apart by 7 votes nt Javaman Feb 2016 #25

88% in still apart by 7 votes. nt Javaman Feb 2016 #26

nevermind... got to brush up on how the caucus works :-P -nt Bradical79 Feb 2016 #27

Clinton campaign's stupidity, SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #38

You are missing the fact that humbled_opinion Feb 2016 #41

I don't believe the final count is in. saltpoint Feb 2016 #28

88% of the vote in. now apart by 6 votes. nt Javaman Feb 2016 #33

"Hillary Clinton wins Iowa precinct by coin toss" 7962 Feb 2016 #42

bet the coin toss was rigged dlwickham Feb 2016 #62

C'Mon HRC Ccarmona Feb 2016 #44

Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #84

Cnn has them tied now. NBC has the return at 88% with Bernie behind by 6. nt Javaman Feb 2016 #45

NBC has them tied now with Bernie behind by 3 votes. nt Javaman Feb 2016 #47

too bad Bernie has more deligates and is within .03, guess who's really gonna win litlbilly Feb 2016 #48

Bernie is behind by 3/10th's of one percent and hes got more deligates, 21/19, Bernie wins litlbilly Feb 2016 #50

just went to a tie 21-21 big_dog Feb 2016 #87

Sorry wrong. Bernie 20 Clinton 19 delegates n/t JesterCS Feb 2016 #49

Now showing Bernie at 21, Hillary at 19. 89% in. James48 Feb 2016 #59

where's the link? joeybee12 Feb 2016 #53

Really. Link, please? nt SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #69

oops Doctor_J Feb 2016 #55

Plaing Texas Hold 'em CountAllVotes Feb 2016 #57

90% in 4 votes now separate them. nt Javaman Feb 2016 #58

still 90% in. 5 votes now apart nt Javaman Feb 2016 #64

Sanders 21 delegates to Clintons 19. nt Javaman Feb 2016 #67

91% in 3 votes apart again. nt Javaman Feb 2016 #68

still91% 4 votes apart. nt Javaman Feb 2016 #71

LINK???????????? nt SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #73

Post removed Post removed Feb 2016 #74

you can fuck off now. Schema Thing Feb 2016 #76

But socialist something something!!!11 arcane1 Feb 2016 #79

+1000 n bunnies Feb 2016 #81

Results of your Jury Service Matariki Feb 2016 #93

Troll. ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2016 #80

In case Schema Thing's post gets hidden, I say you can fuck off, too Orrex Feb 2016 #83

Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #88

I miss him already. Orrex Feb 2016 #91

Go Troll at Fox News Ccarmona Feb 2016 #85

What a child she is Jarqui Feb 2016 #82

Presumptuous. moondust Feb 2016 #86

Good round! californiabernin Feb 2016 #90

"I know we can stand up to the gun lobby" ucrdem Feb 2016 #97

She claimed Texas in 2008, but she actually lost Texas MrTriumph Feb 2016 #98

The media declared her the winner in both Texas and Nevada because she got more votes. StevieM Feb 2016 #103

MSNBC calling this a "bad mistake" ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2016 #105

Wallstreet wins. what a bummer. trillion Feb 2016 #106