Latest Breaking News

James48

(5,213 posts)

59. Now showing Bernie at 21, Hillary at 19. 89% in.

Reply to JesterCS (Reply #49)

Mon Feb 1, 2016, 11:59 PM

Feb 2016

https://www.google.com/#q=iowa+caucus+results&eob=D/2/short/m.03s0w/

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

107 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] onehandle Feb 2016 OP

And no one else yet.... ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2016 #1

I am not sure I would believe it humbled_opinion Feb 2016 #31

at 0.4% now the dif roguevalley Feb 2016 #37

K&R! stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #2

Bit premature with the delegate count tied at 19, no? fbc Feb 2016 #3

She is counting the 5 or 6 Super Delegates... Tommymac Feb 2016 #65

One small state election will not destroy the Dem party. pnwmom Feb 2016 #100

Read it slower Lage Nom Ai Feb 2016 #102

NV, 2008: Hillary won the most votes. Obama won the most delegates. pnwmom Feb 2016 #104

yep thats hillary votes not counted but the arrogant egomaniac already declaring victory bowens43 Feb 2016 #4

From your lips........ 7962 Feb 2016 #6

I am guessing because your MyNameGoesHere Feb 2016 #11

in conjunction to her actions, not so much roguevalley Feb 2016 #40

She is a flawed MyNameGoesHere Feb 2016 #96

I just heard her speak and all I heard was "I' fifteen hundred times. No we, just I. roguevalley Feb 2016 #101

+10000. I can't believe people on a site like this would support her. TPP, Wallstreet, war and all. trillion Feb 2016 #107

Because it's her time RoccoR5955 Feb 2016 #23

Good gawd man, get a grip. Darb Feb 2016 #32

True. SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #46

Could you explain why such intensity? Darb Feb 2016 #52

Too late for me to do supporting research now. SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #60

I'll just take your word for it, that you've got more Darb Feb 2016 #63

Well, I did think saying she and an R were OK, SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #72

OK Darb Feb 2016 #75

Good God. Of course not. I just hope for better. nt SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #78

It's true! She did say this about McCain and Obama. And we know that the Clintons are friends Liberal_Stalwart71 Feb 2016 #94

I don't doubt she said it. It just doesn't reach the level of "intensely" for me. Darb Feb 2016 #99

because santafe52 Feb 2016 #54

This is why jmowreader Feb 2016 #66

I've been driven to her by people like you. JohnnyRingo Feb 2016 #92

Desperation Sets In! mckara Feb 2016 #5

Yeee haaaa! Blue State Bandit Feb 2016 #7

Saw that with an 11 vote difference. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2016 #8

Now just 7 7962 Feb 2016 #14

Saw that. This is hilarious. This isn't "winner take all" either. It's a TIE. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2016 #17

Yes, and she's been projected to win from the start, right? 7962 Feb 2016 #35

I wouldn't even say that. Let her arrogance send it's own message. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2016 #70

OK, that's hilarious. SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #29

It's bullshit. There are still tons of precincts to count, many large precincts that are pro-Bernie StrictlyRockers Feb 2016 #9

+1,000 !!! CountAllVotes Feb 2016 #16

Yeah, I'm confused- Repubs have 10's of thousands of votes, but Dems barely 1k? N/t Fiendish Thingy Feb 2016 #21

those are not votes Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #30

Well, what are they? Fiendish Thingy Feb 2016 #36

delegate counts Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #39

Iowa has over a thousand delegates to the convention? Fiendish Thingy Feb 2016 #43

1681 delegates who go on to the next level. n/t JimDandy Feb 2016 #56

Then why does the graphic in post# 3 show delegates split at 19 each? N/t Fiendish Thingy Feb 2016 #61

I believe they are projecting out for the Dems National Convention JimDandy Feb 2016 #77

Thank You. Is there any data on actual turnout? Fiendish Thingy Feb 2016 #89

No and it's a little odd that they aren't releasing turnout numbers JimDandy Feb 2016 #95

The larger precincts, with heavy Sanders support, have yet to report! LongTomH Feb 2016 #10

Still almost 15% to go! CountAllVotes Feb 2016 #19

10:51 greiner3 Feb 2016 #51

So the counting isnt done, 50/49, and they declare victory? 7962 Feb 2016 #12

In other news Hillary just declared herself President. ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2016 #13

K&R! stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #15

84% in 8 votes between them. still too close to call. nt Javaman Feb 2016 #18

+1,000 !!! CountAllVotes Feb 2016 #20

Hey, that's just according to us peons.... nt SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #34

Thanks to using McCarthyist red-baiting. Odin2005 Feb 2016 #22

86% in they are separated by 7 votes. nt Javaman Feb 2016 #24

87% in. still apart by 7 votes nt Javaman Feb 2016 #25

88% in still apart by 7 votes. nt Javaman Feb 2016 #26

nevermind... got to brush up on how the caucus works :-P -nt Bradical79 Feb 2016 #27

Clinton campaign's stupidity, SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #38

You are missing the fact that humbled_opinion Feb 2016 #41

I don't believe the final count is in. saltpoint Feb 2016 #28

88% of the vote in. now apart by 6 votes. nt Javaman Feb 2016 #33

"Hillary Clinton wins Iowa precinct by coin toss" 7962 Feb 2016 #42

bet the coin toss was rigged dlwickham Feb 2016 #62

C'Mon HRC Ccarmona Feb 2016 #44

Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #84

Cnn has them tied now. NBC has the return at 88% with Bernie behind by 6. nt Javaman Feb 2016 #45

NBC has them tied now with Bernie behind by 3 votes. nt Javaman Feb 2016 #47

too bad Bernie has more deligates and is within .03, guess who's really gonna win litlbilly Feb 2016 #48

Bernie is behind by 3/10th's of one percent and hes got more deligates, 21/19, Bernie wins litlbilly Feb 2016 #50

just went to a tie 21-21 big_dog Feb 2016 #87

Sorry wrong. Bernie 20 Clinton 19 delegates n/t JesterCS Feb 2016 #49

Now showing Bernie at 21, Hillary at 19. 89% in. James48 Feb 2016 #59

where's the link? joeybee12 Feb 2016 #53

Really. Link, please? nt SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #69

oops Doctor_J Feb 2016 #55

Plaing Texas Hold 'em CountAllVotes Feb 2016 #57

90% in 4 votes now separate them. nt Javaman Feb 2016 #58

still 90% in. 5 votes now apart nt Javaman Feb 2016 #64

Sanders 21 delegates to Clintons 19. nt Javaman Feb 2016 #67

91% in 3 votes apart again. nt Javaman Feb 2016 #68

still91% 4 votes apart. nt Javaman Feb 2016 #71

LINK???????????? nt SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #73

Post removed Post removed Feb 2016 #74

you can fuck off now. Schema Thing Feb 2016 #76

But socialist something something!!!11 arcane1 Feb 2016 #79

+1000 n bunnies Feb 2016 #81

Results of your Jury Service Matariki Feb 2016 #93

Troll. ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2016 #80

In case Schema Thing's post gets hidden, I say you can fuck off, too Orrex Feb 2016 #83

Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #88

I miss him already. Orrex Feb 2016 #91

Go Troll at Fox News Ccarmona Feb 2016 #85

What a child she is Jarqui Feb 2016 #82

Presumptuous. moondust Feb 2016 #86

Good round! californiabernin Feb 2016 #90

"I know we can stand up to the gun lobby" ucrdem Feb 2016 #97

She claimed Texas in 2008, but she actually lost Texas MrTriumph Feb 2016 #98

The media declared her the winner in both Texas and Nevada because she got more votes. StevieM Feb 2016 #103

MSNBC calling this a "bad mistake" ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2016 #105

Wallstreet wins. what a bummer. trillion Feb 2016 #106