Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: White House: Clinton qualified to be president [View all]Democat
(11,617 posts)34. Using your own logic, Sanders is not qualified either - but you are wrong
Here, let me rewrite your post for you from the other side:
Sanders recent statements such as his failure to affirm that Clinton is qualified to be Democratic president
suggest to me that he does not have the tact or intelligent to be president.
Obama would never say or insinuate the nasty things about Clinton that Sanders has been saying and insinuating.
These low digs are the resort of a loser, of a vicious loser.
Sanders is alienating Clinton supporters with his loose tongue and his lack of graciousness and lovingness.
The technical aspects of being president are less important than the social ones.
Sanders fails on social graces.
It's not because he is a man. Obama is a man and succeeds when it comes to the social graces.
Warren is a woman and is as kind and gracious as a person can be.
Sander -- no. And that is why I do not think that he is qualified to be president.
That is exactly what a Clinton supporter could say about Sanders and they believe it as much as you believe your nonsense.
Here is the correct answer:
Both Democratic candidates are qualified to be president and both of them would make excellent presidents, especially compared to Trump or Cruz.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Like I couldn't have guessed...and Obama was a one term Senator. Let's see Bernie 25yrs hmmm
bkkyosemite
Apr 2016
#6
You have to be "in government" to decide if someone is qualified to be president?
Democat
Apr 2016
#27
Whoa. I can't believe you'd denigrate a "one term Senator" who went on to become PRESIDENT.
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#82
The very fact that the question was asked and the President defends Hillary's qualification
raindaddy
Apr 2016
#13
Bernie's accusation wasn't legitimate. He blew his top because of a false headline.
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#83
This is like when Bill Clinton had to hold an "I am relevant" press conference.
closeupready
Apr 2016
#19
I disagree. Hillary's recent statements such as her failure to affirm that Bernie is a Democrat
JDPriestly
Apr 2016
#24
Sanders' statement was in response to Hillary's unwillingness to affirm that he is qualified
JDPriestly
Apr 2016
#41
If you read his book, Outsider in the White House, you realize just how much of a Democrat
JDPriestly
Apr 2016
#69
Hillary is not qualified by temperament to take the flak that the president has to take.
JDPriestly
Apr 2016
#78
She can play the liberal part just like you did Mr. President but once elected she will move
INdemo
Apr 2016
#30
Alas, experience does not a competent person make. In fact you can have a lot of experience and
Skwmom
Apr 2016
#45
The source of this controversy is the Washington Post, and anti-Bernie rag if there ever was one:
JDPriestly
Apr 2016
#73
The bashing of Obama in this thread is disgusting. #FeelTheBern and #SipTheTea.
ashtonelijah
Apr 2016
#98