Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Study: Sanders' economic plan piles $18T on federal debt [View all]stopbush
(24,808 posts)75. Foreign aid is LESS than 1% of the federal budget.
There are no real savings to be had by cutting off aid to Israel etal.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
113 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
People who cannot see a doctor or go to school don't see it as "free stuff".
ForgoTheConsequence
May 2016
#17
A "Study"...from "Yahoo"...hahaha hahah ahaha haha haha hahah haha.Made up nonsense
bjobotts
May 2016
#48
I'd pretend it was "free stuff" too were I less educated and more irrational.
LanternWaste
May 2016
#73
In his book, Outsider in the White House, Bernie specifically identifies a number of programs in
JDPriestly
May 2016
#3
Sanders could eliminate the entire defense budget. That saves you $600-billion a year.
stopbush
May 2016
#25
Putting a 1% trans action tax on wall street provides $12 trillion over next ten years
bjobotts
May 2016
#43
I will aggressively support Hillary if Bernie loses, but that doesnt mean I dont
Jackie Wilson Said
May 2016
#27
I don't know why anyone believes the country has an appetite for the tax increases he suggests.
CrowCityDem
May 2016
#8
I was including state taxes, since people often look just at the bottom line, and conflate them all.
CrowCityDem
May 2016
#38
We already pay exorbitant amounts of health insurance. I'd rather pay that money in taxes and get
JDPriestly
May 2016
#44
I'll show you studies that tell you how great trickle down economics is. nt
thereismore
May 2016
#10
That $4,300 would be money spent in the economy, getting it actually going again.
-none
May 2016
#67
I'm sure you're aware of which side of political spectrum propagates that foreign aid talking point.
LonePirate
May 2016
#66
I agree. The whole notion of cutting foreign aid to fund a single payer system is absurd.
LonePirate
May 2016
#77
I can see they're playing dumb. 10yr cost 32T$ - 15.2T$ increase on wealthy. They forget...
Festivito
May 2016
#29
Can you name one thing not covered in any of: England, Sweden, Germany, France, ...
Festivito
May 2016
#45
But, they cover everyone at half our cost. Name one thing not covered by the non-corp insured then.
Festivito
May 2016
#60
Bernie has been in Congress since 1992. He knows, and we know that when we get single payer (and
JDPriestly
May 2016
#52
Less than half MAY NOT BE ACCURATE for you, but it is accurate enough for a lot of people!
Festivito
May 2016
#65
No, but I'd say that the "it's not accurate" is a game of smoke, haze, obfuscation: hiding of truth.
Festivito
May 2016
#74
He has stated many times it is time for the rich to pay their fair share of taxes, then someone in
Thinkingabout
May 2016
#30
Our current plan costs lives. The only reason that single payer could be more expensive than the
JDPriestly
May 2016
#54
Eliminate the rich's war addiction which is equal to 18T and we can have all these programs.
Dont call me Shirley
May 2016
#110