Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Study: Sanders' economic plan piles $18T on federal debt [View all]McKim
(2,426 posts)105. Oh, is Bernie Unrealistic? For Shame!
Oh my goodness, we can't have something better than in Europe and raise taxes to do it, that would be a crime!
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
113 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
People who cannot see a doctor or go to school don't see it as "free stuff".
ForgoTheConsequence
May 2016
#17
A "Study"...from "Yahoo"...hahaha hahah ahaha haha haha hahah haha.Made up nonsense
bjobotts
May 2016
#48
I'd pretend it was "free stuff" too were I less educated and more irrational.
LanternWaste
May 2016
#73
In his book, Outsider in the White House, Bernie specifically identifies a number of programs in
JDPriestly
May 2016
#3
Sanders could eliminate the entire defense budget. That saves you $600-billion a year.
stopbush
May 2016
#25
Putting a 1% trans action tax on wall street provides $12 trillion over next ten years
bjobotts
May 2016
#43
I will aggressively support Hillary if Bernie loses, but that doesnt mean I dont
Jackie Wilson Said
May 2016
#27
I don't know why anyone believes the country has an appetite for the tax increases he suggests.
CrowCityDem
May 2016
#8
I was including state taxes, since people often look just at the bottom line, and conflate them all.
CrowCityDem
May 2016
#38
We already pay exorbitant amounts of health insurance. I'd rather pay that money in taxes and get
JDPriestly
May 2016
#44
I'll show you studies that tell you how great trickle down economics is. nt
thereismore
May 2016
#10
That $4,300 would be money spent in the economy, getting it actually going again.
-none
May 2016
#67
I'm sure you're aware of which side of political spectrum propagates that foreign aid talking point.
LonePirate
May 2016
#66
I agree. The whole notion of cutting foreign aid to fund a single payer system is absurd.
LonePirate
May 2016
#77
I can see they're playing dumb. 10yr cost 32T$ - 15.2T$ increase on wealthy. They forget...
Festivito
May 2016
#29
Can you name one thing not covered in any of: England, Sweden, Germany, France, ...
Festivito
May 2016
#45
But, they cover everyone at half our cost. Name one thing not covered by the non-corp insured then.
Festivito
May 2016
#60
Bernie has been in Congress since 1992. He knows, and we know that when we get single payer (and
JDPriestly
May 2016
#52
Less than half MAY NOT BE ACCURATE for you, but it is accurate enough for a lot of people!
Festivito
May 2016
#65
No, but I'd say that the "it's not accurate" is a game of smoke, haze, obfuscation: hiding of truth.
Festivito
May 2016
#74
He has stated many times it is time for the rich to pay their fair share of taxes, then someone in
Thinkingabout
May 2016
#30
Our current plan costs lives. The only reason that single payer could be more expensive than the
JDPriestly
May 2016
#54
Eliminate the rich's war addiction which is equal to 18T and we can have all these programs.
Dont call me Shirley
May 2016
#110