Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Hillary wins Washington State Primary [View all]Festivito
(13,891 posts)67. Last updated on 05/24/2016 9:19 PM (No statement that count WAS complete)
LBN title should be: President Democratic Party - County Results Last updated on 05/24/2016 9:19 PM
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's not meaningless. It shows the results of a much more representative and inclusive
pnwmom
May 2016
#10
Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton and presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump each won
wallyworld2
May 2016
#32
its a meaningless primary, no delegates allocated, Sanders CRUSHED her in the real one earlier
AntiBank
May 2016
#4
funny how NY and other Clinton machine dominated places worked overtime to block people from voting
AntiBank
May 2016
#13
yes, they are neighbourhood meetings, with speeches in favour of candidates, and votes are taken
AntiBank
May 2016
#33
He crushed her in the caucus. If it had been a primary the result would have been quite different,
StevieM
May 2016
#9
It's only meaningless because it was "rigged" that way. The voters approved a referendum
pnwmom
May 2016
#16
26,314 delegates, not voters in the caucuses. Over 230,000 people participated in the caucuses.
uppityperson
May 2016
#60
Well, that kind of messes up all those CA projections based on the WA caucuses.
TwilightZone
May 2016
#22
It might just be due to the fundamental difference between caucuses and primaries.
TwilightZone
May 2016
#25
bullshit>>>Clinton is the only remaining candidate whose supporters don't have a history of violence
AntiBank
May 2016
#38
"were (sic) a blue State not a Sanders state." LOLOLOL Sanders is blue as hell if blue means
AntiBank
May 2016
#44
Seeing as many are trumpeting on about regular primaries (vis-a-vis caucus states)
AntiBank
May 2016
#41
I know many people who didn't vote in this primary since it means nothing.
uppityperson
May 2016
#59
The superdelegates from WA state-(& Neb) can now point to the Popular vote win by Hillary. The
riversedge
May 2016
#74
So you were expecting us to vote in the primary for one when we've already busted our caucus off?
JackInGreen
May 2016
#75
If she won, then the election was either meaningless or rigged against Sanders.
LanternWaste
May 2016
#78
Because no delegates are awarded due to this vote. It was a meaningless vote as far as
uppityperson
May 2016
#84