Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Dems discuss dropping Wasserman Schultz [View all] OrwellwasRight May 2016 OP
Not going to happen. She will serve until the end of this cycle. But Sanders is free to leave. Trust Buster May 2016 #1
Be careful what you wish for. JDPriestly May 2016 #6
I'm very careful about wishing Sanders gone. LOL Trust Buster May 2016 #16
I'm just happy wishing 840high May 2016 #42
That ship has sailed. She's the presumptive nominee. Trust Buster May 2016 #44
Sorry, nobody remembers "presumptive nominees." tabasco May 2016 #48
Still did better than Sanders. What does that say about him ? Trust Buster May 2016 #51
Why are you obsessed with Sanders if Clinton is the presumptive nominee? tabasco May 2016 #53
No, I'm just reveling in his defeat.......LOL Trust Buster May 2016 #54
Weird. tabasco May 2016 #61
Nevada exaggeration disgraceful Baobab May 2016 #80
So, now out in the open: Better Trump than Bernie? sadoldgirl May 2016 #75
Many Hillary supporters are so corporate they just can't stand the fact that a progressive dared cui bono May 2016 #78
Those are not the two choices before us. Good try.....LOL Trust Buster May 2016 #79
Did better than Sanders cannabis_flower May 2016 #93
Exactly. And will do so much worse in the general. GoneOffShore May 2016 #101
Closed primaries, or open primaries... which on is more reflective of the nation and the will of the FighttheFuture May 2016 #109
English teacher here NJCher May 2016 #64
She does not get labeled the "presumptive nominee" until dflprincess May 2016 #52
She doesn't need the number of pledged delegates required to clinch the nomination Thor_MN May 2016 #63
Clinton's healthcare plan was a diversion from a trade deal that was making Baobab May 2016 #82
Sorry, on CNN the D Party bigwig took our friend Tapper libdem4life May 2016 #127
The Party needs him and his supporters a hella lot more than it needs her. Raster May 2016 #17
With friends like Sanders and his minions, who needs enemies ? I side with DWS. Trust Buster May 2016 #18
I'm sure you do. Raster May 2016 #25
Of Course You Do pmorlan1 May 2016 #26
I side with DWS. AlbertCat May 2016 #33
Supporting DWS? markbark May 2016 #50
Really? LeFleur1 May 2016 #73
Maybe Democrats lost a bunch of voters because their candidates were truebluegreen May 2016 #85
Victim blaming? samson212 May 2016 #103
Or maybe there are a bunch of laws screwing over low incomce Dem voters Stryst May 2016 #105
If someone ran a business as badly as DWS runs the Democratic Party.. nxylas May 2016 #94
...and well on track to lose Presidency. nt chknltl May 2016 #111
Do you like her supporting Republicans or her support of usury more? nt Gore1FL May 2016 #66
you damn well better hope the "minions" hold their collective noses or the country of Slovenia AntiBank May 2016 #70
Because you are just such a sweetheart. cui bono May 2016 #76
...and her Payday Lender buddies, too!!! Enjoy your cesspool. FighttheFuture May 2016 #110
If DWS wasn't such a shill for Hillary would you still support her? INdemo May 2016 #125
She will still be a cool Clinton kid --- maybe Secretary of Interior. Hoppy May 2016 #41
She could serve as Bill's scretary setting up his intinerary ?? INdemo May 2016 #126
Just as Hills was free to leave at this point back in 2008 Nirgendwo May 2016 #22
The wind, they're afraid of the wind and the tides. GoneOffShore May 2016 #102
If he did Hillary would lose to him in the GE. cui bono May 2016 #77
Her relationship to Hillary is not the only reason DWS needs the axe randr May 2016 #98
The Hill is not friend to Hillary riversedge May 2016 #2
you think the paper/website Hill is bad, wait for the 2017 Rethug Congress on THE Hill AntiBank May 2016 #62
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #87
She should go some time after June 14. Renew Deal May 2016 #3
Yep. cali May 2016 #89
She is divisive. zentrum May 2016 #4
I think you've hit on it. She tries.to run the party like a sorority president. hedda_foil May 2016 #84
that is a most apt comparison. Betty Karlson May 2016 #124
She should resign, but she probably won't. JDPriestly May 2016 #5
I'm glad somebody else saw what I saw in the NV videos. OrwellwasRight May 2016 #9
There was no violence in NV. It was manufactured outrage and slight-of-hand. Raster May 2016 #23
Clinton is too arrogant and too vindictive to allow her to step down. w4rma May 2016 #7
Maybe she will get a choice appointment in some non-descript corner of the federal government. OrwellwasRight May 2016 #19
Maybe Associate Justice? Hoppy May 2016 #43
I hope not. OrwellwasRight May 2016 #47
If Clinton is the nominee I am only voting for her in the GE for her SCOTUS choices. Gore1FL May 2016 #69
I'm sure there is a place for her in the Payday Loan Industry...n/t BuelahWitch May 2016 #99
There's no free lunch, especially when you lose bluestateguy May 2016 #8
You aren't getting anything back from me for this little morsel. She should have been gone years ago w4rma May 2016 #11
All that and more. Chipper Chat May 2016 #100
It's not the Sanders crowd: HeartoftheMidwest May 2016 #13
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #32
There's no free lunch, even if you manage to win! AlbertCat May 2016 #35
What you will be getting in return passiveporcupine May 2016 #58
Maybe she'll switch to the Republican Party once the Democrats move left. jalan48 May 2016 #10
They don't call her DINO Debbie for nothing. Raster May 2016 #29
Listen! Debbie is no more of a DINO than Hillary! Enthusiast May 2016 #106
You got me there.... cannot disagree! Raster May 2016 #122
Translation: She's done all the rigging we could possibly hope for, Nyan May 2016 #12
Too little too late n/t xloadiex May 2016 #14
She has openly supported her GOP cronies, down here in Florida. djean111 May 2016 #15
Which GOP candidates did she support over Democrats? oberliner May 2016 #46
Here you go dflprincess May 2016 #57
Ouch! StoneCarver May 2016 #97
was totally unaware of this NJCher May 2016 #68
What a bullshit article. Not one Democrat who is calling for this is named, but those that are still_one May 2016 #20
This is not based on confirmed sources, but innuendos and rumors AlbertCat May 2016 #38
....... imari362 May 2016 #40
A little late, but not going to happen anyway. NV Whino May 2016 #21
In 1 year Hillary will be President, and Debbie Wasserman Schultz will be a sitting Representative. onehandle May 2016 #24
Bernie will be back to only being seen on MSNBC and other cable news channels. AlbertCat May 2016 #39
Bernie has been doing his job this entire time Lordquinton May 2016 #88
She gets paid to tell... freebrew May 2016 #104
a sitting Representative making sure that usury payday loans flow like water to rape the poor AntiBank May 2016 #65
If your scenario plays out, in 4 years Hillary will likely be primaried if she wins at all. Gore1FL May 2016 #71
Won't be good enough for the purists. Gman May 2016 #27
I love how now actually being even mildly progressive is now "purist" into today's triangulated AntiBank May 2016 #67
Blue is a nice. ThoughtCriminal May 2016 #28
and see, I was leaning toward a silver platter. but, I am willing to compromise Hiraeth May 2016 #116
FIRE DWS! Donate to Democratic Underground for Tim Canova FL-23 here Omaha Steve May 2016 #30
She's served her purpose. Jester Messiah May 2016 #31
If they were smart pmorlan1 May 2016 #34
I'll believe it when I see it. mudstump May 2016 #36
Dump her... ReRe May 2016 #37
Even if they dump her d_legendary1 May 2016 #45
Term limits is there. I just don't care if they are discussing her leaving. Xyzse May 2016 #49
Can We Dance... LovingA2andMI May 2016 #55
CNN is covering this as I type... eom Purveyor May 2016 #56
Ding Dong' the merry-oh, sing it high, sing it low. Cobalt Violet May 2016 #59
the ONLY reason ANYONE is siding with DWS is because she is a Clinton Shill AntiBank May 2016 #60
It certainly isn't talent or job performance. n/t Gore1FL May 2016 #72
PLEASE let it be so... bullwinkle428 May 2016 #74
Wow.. disillusioned73 May 2016 #81
If it happens drinks are on the house at the DU Pub...... raindaddy May 2016 #83
Not a good week for Clinton DNC heads trudyco May 2016 #86
That would be a start Android3.14 May 2016 #90
Already everyone is at each others throats.. Harriety May 2016 #91
A voice of reason. jonestonesusa May 2016 #96
Agree. OrwellwasRight May 2016 #112
Waaaaaaaaay too lat for that. jeff47 May 2016 #117
The Real Story - DWS Has Become A Drag On HRC cantbeserious May 2016 #92
True. nt. OrwellwasRight May 2016 #95
Bingo hueymahl May 2016 #108
DWS offered up as the sacrificial lamb to bring Sanders supporters on board with HRC GummyBearz May 2016 #107
She needs to go becasue she is bad at the job (and bad at being human) Gore1FL May 2016 #113
I agree with you completely GummyBearz May 2016 #114
Meanwhile, let's help kick DWS's ass out of Congress. . . DinahMoeHum May 2016 #115
Fire the republican sympathizer! fbc May 2016 #118
Thankyou Bernie Sanders. marble falls May 2016 #119
Wonder how much a GOP PAC coming out in support of her had to do with it? CrispyQ May 2016 #120
DWS, the shit sandwich. Helen Borg May 2016 #121
DISCUSS? SmittynMo May 2016 #123
NOT ditching her could fracture the party. citizen blues May 2016 #128
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Dems discuss dropping Was...»Reply #116