Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Warren: 'I don’t believe in superdelegates’ [View all]Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)27. This is what he said and I support him in standing to this!
I support Bernie and will be sad when he looses. That is a fact. However I think there is no harm in letting the game finish. California vote on the 7th and then the balance on the following Tuesday. Let it finish and then we will have a winner. No harm no foul.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bernie does. He says the AP shouldn't call the election on the basis of the pledged
pnwmom
Jun 2016
#3
They can't call the election on the "basis of pledged delegates" because it won't happen before
cui bono
Jun 2016
#6
Almost certainly they will, but they are not obligated to. The super delegates are there as a
MillennialDem
Jun 2016
#31
So what happened to the Sanders claim that the superdelegates should vote with the people?
George II
Jun 2016
#21
Sanders has already said he wants superdelegates to vote the way their state did
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2016
#18
Simply put (I've posted this a couple of times already), regardless of the way the superdelegates...
George II
Jun 2016
#22
Using each of the methods of assigning superdelegates that the Sanders campaign themselves...
George II
Jun 2016
#41