Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Senator Murphy is absolutely right. Squinch Jun 2016 #1
I concur, Squinch. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #3
I agree. nt brer cat Jun 2016 #34
Supreme Court Decision on 2nd Amendment askeptic Jun 2016 #2
Local new says he had a state firearm license and a security guard license Mojorabbit Jun 2016 #4
It's completely absurd, but your post got alerted on A HERETIC I AM Jun 2016 #9
Well someone can't alert Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #27
Wow! I guess demagogue-ing the issue raises more money askeptic Jun 2016 #44
The 18th amendment was repealed MyNameGoesHere Jun 2016 #10
The amendment itself is not creating violence. Indydem Jun 2016 #21
Then it goes back to the states Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #28
Almost right, it's the Supreme Court's interpretation that counts. charliea Jun 2016 #61
He is absolutely right mcar Jun 2016 #5
As a Private Security Guard One_Life_To_Give Jun 2016 #6
You tell them Senator Murphy! KPN Jun 2016 #7
According to Raw Story, the shooter's father says two guys kissing set him off. Archae Jun 2016 #8
The shooter is part of a society, and society is to blame, culture is to blame, schools are to blame L. Coyote Jun 2016 #13
The shooters decisions were his and his alone. beevul Jun 2016 #17
If you say so. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #19
Ok. Whats your part of the responsiblity...? beevul Jun 2016 #20
As US citizens we can absolutely be held responsible for not making this a priority justiceischeap Jun 2016 #23
Explain to me... beevul Jun 2016 #24
Sure, the perfect example is what happened on the day of Sandy Hook justiceischeap Jun 2016 #25
paris france beergood Jun 2016 #39
Its difficult to prove a negative LiberalLovinLug Jun 2016 #68
The shooter who owned an AR-15 is to blame. TNNurse Jun 2016 #58
Agreed. Civilians do not need assault rifles. Vinca Jun 2016 #11
Time to send the assault weapon supporters packing. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #12
One serious question... Archae Jun 2016 #15
Vote them out of Congress was my point. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #16
We could start SwankyXomb Jun 2016 #26
And ignore the Democratic platform Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #29
Every single senator and Congressperson with an NRA A+ rating is now an enemy. Initech Jun 2016 #14
Blood all over their money grubbing hands SwankyXomb Jun 2016 #53
I would make than anyone above an F rating. alarimer Jun 2016 #64
No arguments here! Fuck the NRA! Initech Jun 2016 #66
The truth will fall on deaf ears, as usual. tabasco Jun 2016 #18
Congress continues to sit on its hands and do nothing – again.” AlbertCat Jun 2016 #22
Assault weapons used to be banned mountain grammy Jun 2016 #30
There is a fundamental flaw in that analysis hack89 Jun 2016 #49
Just a question...this freak had passed Fed NICS chks to get his gun clearances Nancyswidower Jun 2016 #31
why does ANYONE need an AR-15? Skittles Jun 2016 #43
Need...I don't believe that is a standard requirement for any "Right" Nancyswidower Jun 2016 #45
ALRIGHTY THEN Skittles Jun 2016 #46
If you are making Rights a need issue..that's your fear. Nancyswidower Jun 2016 #47
We don't. But people want them. They are expensive toys, that can be lethal. Archae Jun 2016 #60
Perhaps Some Of The "Kill The Gays" Rhetoric From Jeezusland or Muzzlimland Got To Him scottie55 Jun 2016 #32
"Buddhists don't kill anyone for any reason." beergood Jun 2016 #40
Let me guess; they'll say "they aren't real Buddhists." greyl Jun 2016 #55
Why does any law abiding citizen need an AR-15 with a clip that spews 30 rounds without reloading? catbyte Jun 2016 #33
Good post, catbyte. brer cat Jun 2016 #35
What is so special about an AR-15 that it needs more restrictions ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #38
I wasn't specifically targeting that particular model & I think you know that. catbyte Jun 2016 #62
And yet you did exactly that. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #63
So you want me to list every fucking semiautomatic, multiple clip weapon in a short message? Don't catbyte Jun 2016 #65
If you meant to say ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #67
I entirely agree. dickthegrouch Jun 2016 #36
sorry , a little bored and playing around with the reply functions. beergood Jun 2016 #41
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #52
Wow. tarheelsunc Jun 2016 #37
He's not supposed to call it an "epidemic" of gun violence LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jun 2016 #42
The only people complicit in this is the shooter and his IS buddies. Odin2005 Jun 2016 #48
Not entirely true. bvar22 Jun 2016 #50
Guess who I've been wanting as the VP on the Democratic ticket this year for awhile? ButterflyBlood Jun 2016 #51
Nonsense. David__77 Jun 2016 #54
LOCKING THREAD AS ANALYSIS/OPINION (Lock-Retracted) LostOne4Ever Jun 2016 #56
UNLOCKING THREAD LostOne4Ever Jun 2016 #57
Damn right, congress is complicit. TryLogic Jun 2016 #59
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Congress Is ‘Complicit’ I...»Reply #18