Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Judge blocks Seattle from revealing locations of FBI’s hidden cameras on utility poles [View all]1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)5. This is settled law ...
when out in public, one has no reasonable expectation of privacy regarding where one is and/or what one is doing.
BTW, do you know how the majority of missing children/persons are found?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Judge blocks Seattle from revealing locations of FBI’s hidden cameras on utility poles [View all]
NWCorona
Jun 2016
OP
and apparently in a humorous mood, too. Do you specialize in privacy right case law, btw?
villager
Jun 2016
#30
But the issue I have is what proof do we have that these cameras will be made available
NWCorona
Jun 2016
#22
So is there a difference between being observed in public and recorded in public?
beardown
Jun 2016
#21
Shhh ... How they identified the Boston Bombers is to not be discussed ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2016
#44