Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Judge blocks Seattle from revealing locations of FBI’s hidden cameras on utility poles [View all]1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)11. Actually, I don't, and won't, spend much time worrying about it. ...
And regarding your missing child/persons comment, you clearly know nothing about missing persons investigations ... if cameras are available, they are the first stop for the investigators.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Judge blocks Seattle from revealing locations of FBI’s hidden cameras on utility poles [View all]
NWCorona
Jun 2016
OP
and apparently in a humorous mood, too. Do you specialize in privacy right case law, btw?
villager
Jun 2016
#30
But the issue I have is what proof do we have that these cameras will be made available
NWCorona
Jun 2016
#22
So is there a difference between being observed in public and recorded in public?
beardown
Jun 2016
#21
Shhh ... How they identified the Boston Bombers is to not be discussed ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2016
#44