Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Response to bettyellen (Reply #44)

Post removed

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Republicans attempt to buy Murkowski's vote in new draft of health care bill [View all] kstewart33 Sep 2017 OP

How would that be fair to all the other states? Ligyron Sep 2017 #1

It's not meant to be fair NastyRiffraff Sep 2017 #20

You'd think this would cause screams of "Where's mine!?" up and down the Senate halls. Gidney N Cloyd Sep 2017 #26

I think they know enough.... SergeStorms Sep 2017 #33

This sound like the cornhusker kickbacks IronLionZion Sep 2017 #2

Rethugs have no shame. kairos12 Sep 2017 #24

Let's Hope That Murkowski Has Enough Integrity Not To Fall For This......nt global1 Sep 2017 #3

He's a repug, there is no integrity RainCaster Sep 2017 #11

He's A She & She Voted Against The Last Attempt The Repugs Made To Repeal & Replace.... global1 Sep 2017 #14

Murkowsky is a "she" OldHippieChick Sep 2017 #17

The last vote means nothing now wolfie001 Sep 2017 #21

Lately? She voted against repealing Obamacare. Weeks ago. bettyellen Sep 2017 #27

I'm referring to the vote NOW!!! wolfie001 Sep 2017 #41

Lately means recently. Not next week. And a big hello to you too. bettyellen Sep 2017 #42

Last time...... wolfie001 Sep 2017 #43

You should have chosen a catchphrase that applies then. Because she's done stuff for you lately. HA bettyellen Sep 2017 #44

Post removed Post removed Sep 2017 #45

Sorry, SergeStorms Sep 2017 #34

He? we can do it Sep 2017 #40

They don't care how it looks... Promee Sep 2017 #4

The only person who I think may actually vote NO is Murkowski. BigmanPigman Sep 2017 #8

Well, if Murkowski doesn't take the bribe. Promee Sep 2017 #13

His grandstanding and ego are almost as bad as BigmanPigman Sep 2017 #31

Chinless Mitch is so all fired Scarsdale Sep 2017 #12

Let's see... Promee Sep 2017 #15

But leaving 32 Million ppl without healthcare is the major impact. Everything else is politics. iluvtennis Sep 2017 #18

And if these people cared about that... Promee Sep 2017 #22

32 million ppl are worth $12.50 each to the rethugs... iluvtennis Sep 2017 #25

follow the money. mopinko Sep 2017 #23

Yes, donor money, and lots of it. Plus, he and wifey will benefit from any tax WinkyDink Sep 2017 #28

Mitch Mc Turtle is the one who destroyed participatory democracy. Ligyron Sep 2017 #37

So Get On The Phones People And Call Collins.....nt global1 Sep 2017 #16

You know, thats one of the problems of federalism. drray23 Sep 2017 #5

I thought the publicans were against marybourg Sep 2017 #6

Is this legal? What's the legal justification for singling those two states out? pnwmom Sep 2017 #7

"Is this legal?" - It isn't even that unusual when major important bills are passed... PoliticAverse Sep 2017 #10

Who rules, makes the rules. WinkyDink Sep 2017 #29

The Republicans are foaming at the mouth to push this motherfucker through...... Old Vet Sep 2017 #9

You omitted "kill." WinkyDink Sep 2017 #30

DESPICABLE politics. Hopefully Lisa will keep her eye on the ball for the good of many, iluvtennis Sep 2017 #19

So the ACA videohead5 Sep 2017 #32

Yup. Promee Sep 2017 #35

She didn't like the result Borchkins Sep 2017 #36

Don't see why McCain would vote for it Juliusseizure Sep 2017 #38

Contact Senator Murkowski. Dem2theMax Sep 2017 #39

Pork barrel Man_Bear_Pig Sep 2017 #46

Wouldn't this invalidate the required CBO score due out tomorrow? briv1016 Sep 2017 #47