Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

pnwmom

(110,324 posts)

7. Yes, an Independent committee would be better. And we might not be able to get one

Reply to BigmanPigman (Reply #6)

Fri Feb 9, 2018, 03:09 AM

Feb 2018

till after we win a majority in at least one of the Houses.

On second thought, I just remembered hearing someone point out today that no one knows FOR SURE whether a President could be indicted. So if Mueller wanted to, he could get a grand jury to indict, and then see what the Supreme Court has to say about that. In the meantime, the indictment would be public.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FBI surveillance of Carter Page might have picked up Bannon [View all] pnwmom Feb 2018 OP

Probably why he red-faced skipped the House interview last week. Ooopha! ffr Feb 2018 #1

one of dese days, Bannon, bdtrppr6 Feb 2018 #2

It struck me as odd that Nunes/WH/Rs would DeminPennswoods Feb 2018 #3

I agree. RDANGELO Feb 2018 #5

As Malcolm Nance says Corgigal Feb 2018 #4

I found out that when Mueller is done the investigation, it gets BigmanPigman Feb 2018 #6

Yes, an Independent committee would be better. And we might not be able to get one pnwmom Feb 2018 #7

I don't think it will be possible to keep it under wraps. lagomorph777 Feb 2018 #10

I hope it happens in my lifetime. BigmanPigman Feb 2018 #11

TY, pnwmom Cha Feb 2018 #8

Maybe that's why Bannon declined to testify recently. Nitram Feb 2018 #9