Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: BREAKING: British lawmakers seize control of Brexit process from government [View all]Denzil_DC
(8,994 posts)24. I don't know whether you intended to reply to me or TomVilmer, anciata
If you were aiming for Tom, he won't get a "My Posts" alert on your reply.
I'm genuinely curious what Tom's basing these claims on, then we can maybe discuss them. Or maybe we'll both have better things to do with our time!
"Greater centralization" puzzles me. It goes 100% against the EU doctrine of subsidiarity.
The EU is making moves towards greater military coordination between member countries, it's true. Whether that can be classed as "Fortress Europe" in a way that lives up to the sensational buzzword depends on whose interpretation you listen to. But then I live in Fortress UK, the second- or third-largest arms dealer in the world and keen poodle of US militarism, so maybe my tolerance for these things is different.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
BREAKING: British lawmakers seize control of Brexit process from government [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Mar 2019
OP
"which might include a second referendum"-- heavens, if there is any sanity left, I'd hope so...
hlthe2b
Mar 2019
#1
Am I to understand from this, that they will enact is a 2nd referendum to prevent a no-deal Brexit?
ancianita
Mar 2019
#5
I read the other day about plans to evacuate the Queen and the royal family if things go wrong.
dewsgirl
Mar 2019
#3
Are you kidding? Did you read why that would be necessary? I can't even imagine it.
ancianita
Mar 2019
#14
Same here, and why our evil over here has resulted in my being uninformed about thinking over there.
ancianita
Mar 2019
#20
Seems like the queen would be the last person Brits would direct their ire toward. She IS England.
ancianita
Mar 2019
#21
Not when it comes to the queen. They know the queen, AS England, is always on the people's side.
ancianita
Mar 2019
#34
Sure; but those in charge of that "scenario" make no comment of that possibility; neither would I.
ancianita
Mar 2019
#39
The article quotes an unnamed cabinet official, so take it for what it's worth.
marylandblue
Mar 2019
#42
Their action has become their only option. I wish them success, even as the votes are non-binding.
ancianita
Mar 2019
#4
My Tory MP unexpectedly grew a conscience, brain and spine, and voted against the government
muriel_volestrangler
Mar 2019
#6
I understand the EU's militarization as a direct answer to Trump and Russia, not centralization.
ancianita
Mar 2019
#32
Thanks for such an informative list. It does look as if it's caused by Trump/Putin threat.
ancianita
Mar 2019
#35
In those terms of 'Fortress Europe' - putting up barriers against refugees
muriel_volestrangler
Mar 2019
#45
I wonder about your first sentence, too. Are there links to this model you describe?
ancianita
Mar 2019
#27
He is a comedian (Tom Walker), playing a journalist who snaps when off air
muriel_volestrangler
Mar 2019
#29
His articulate gangsta anger doesn't hurt his clarity, either. Even if it's comedy, it's helpful.
ancianita
Mar 2019
#25