Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(168,465 posts)
11. Why does the media validate the Exec. Branch having authority to expend funds not appropriated?
Sat Aug 8, 2020, 08:22 AM
Aug 2020


U.S. Constitution

Article I


/snip

Section 9.

/snip

No money shall be drawn from the treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law; and a regular statement and account of receipts and expenditures of all public money shall be published from time to time.

/snip

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlei


And FFS Forbes - this bullshit that you wrote -

What we don’t know

It’s not clear what power the president has to order federal spending without explicit approval from Congress. When asked if he was concerned about the potential legality of the planned executive orders, Trump replied, “no, not at all. You always get sued.”


WTF Forbes? It IS fucking CLEAR.

Antideficiency Act

Overview

This act prohibits federal agencies from obligations or expending federal funds in advance or in excess of an appropriation, and from accepting voluntary services.

The Antideficiency Act prohibits federal employees from

making or authorizing an expenditure from, or creating or authorizing an obligation under, any appropriation or fund in excess of the amount available in the appropriation or fund unless authorized by law. 31 U.S.C. § 1341(a)(1)(A).
involving the government in any obligation to pay money before funds have been appropriated for that purpose, unless otherwise allowed by law. 31 U.S.C. § 1341(a)(1)(B).
accepting voluntary services for the United States, or employing personal services not authorized by law, except in cases of emergency involving the safety of human life or the protection of property. 31 U.S.C. § 1342.
making obligations or expenditures in excess of an apportionment or reapportionment, or in excess of the amount permitted by agency regulations. 31 U.S.C. § 1517(a).

Federal employees who violate the Antideficiency Act are subject to two types of sanctions: administrative and penal. Employees may be subject to appropriate administrative discipline including, when circumstances warrant, suspension from duty without pay or removal from office. In addition, employees may also be subject to fines, imprisonment, or both.

https://www.gao.gov/legal/appropriations-law-decisions/resources


Now if the deadline for expending the funds runs out, CONGRESS has to extend it and if the money runs out before a deadline, CONGRESS has to authorize more funds. And unless some heretofore obscure provision was written in that stimulus bill allowing for the Executive to do extensions, then they CAN'T (which is why all the drama going on with Congress at the moment to extend it and for how long and for what amount).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

he is such a fucking moron Skittles Aug 2020 #1
That's my question DownriverDem Aug 2020 #9
He cares not that he doesn't have authority to do this... SergeStorms Aug 2020 #2
Me too DownriverDem Aug 2020 #10
He could forgive all my student loans ($100K)... B Stieg Aug 2020 #3
Same. I'd love the relief... a la izquierda Aug 2020 #6
Oppo research website PirateRo Aug 2020 #4
Republicans railed & whined about Obama's EO's, but here? bucolic_frolic Aug 2020 #5
I knw, right! Nexus2 Aug 2020 #12
His negotiations were a red herring, he had no intention of reaching a deal groundloop Aug 2020 #7
He will claim he is helping the unemployed LiberalFighter Aug 2020 #18
Let's see the details; shitstain... EarthFirst Aug 2020 #8
Why does the media validate the Exec. Branch having authority to expend funds not appropriated? BumRushDaShow Aug 2020 #11
My thoughts exactly. paleotn Aug 2020 #16
Their reporters are too lazy BumRushDaShow Aug 2020 #17
Go after the writer. Be specific about the writer. LiberalFighter Aug 2020 #19
But in the excerpt from the article that I posted BumRushDaShow Aug 2020 #22
But only her name is attached. LiberalFighter Aug 2020 #24
They have editors BumRushDaShow Aug 2020 #25
Let him use his ow.... uh, Putin's money. Lock him up. Aug 2020 #21
Is this before or after he unveils his health care plan. It is his fault that we don't have an Demsrule86 Aug 2020 #13
Um, no, Donnie. It doesn't work that way. paleotn Aug 2020 #14
So...Donnie has Turtle and his other bootlickers RIG this up in the Senate Bengus81 Aug 2020 #15
Fucker likes signing his name nt benld74 Aug 2020 #20
That's not a signature... AZ8theist Aug 2020 #26
He doesn't have the "power of the purse," but if he goes ahead and signs such a thing the Vinca Aug 2020 #23
$400 UE extension but states have to pick up 25% of it durablend Aug 2020 #27
After a review by forum hosts....LOCKING Omaha Steve Aug 2020 #28
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump Promises Executive ...»Reply #11