Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lonestarblue

(13,348 posts)
10. Prior to 2016, polls were fairly accurate.
Tue Nov 10, 2020, 06:01 PM
Nov 2020

In 2016, both pre-voting polls and exit polls showed Clinton winning, even with small margins. The 2020 polls were showing Democratic margins outside the margin of error in many cases, and I seem to remember that Cunningham’s race was one of those. The polls were actually forecasting a blue wave. So my question is why have the polls suddenly been so wrong in elections that Republicans were not expected to win but did.

As I recall, there were lots of excuses in 2016 like calling only landlines and not cell phones. This time pollsters adjusted for education level and gender and other factors that came out of the 2016 failure. Isn’t it time for us to stop saying the polls were wrong and start wondering how Republicans are manipulating the vote?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Tillis wins North Carolin...»Reply #10