Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Dianne Feinstein defends GOP senators' right to object to election results [View all]still_one
(98,883 posts)119. She isn't going to resign, and her legislative actions have been always been progressive
https://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/Dianne_Feinstein.htm
She was ahead of the whole country on the Aids crisis in the 80's, women's rights, gun control, etc. etc. etc.
and there is no doubt she will vote to convict when the Senate trial begins, just like she did the first time.
On almost all issues she votes the right way.
This will be her last term as Senator, and she has been a good Senator for the country and California
The point I was making is that I believe she was arguing from a procedural perspective not taking into consideration that what the republicans were trying to do was actually overturn the election.
In 2016 there were some Democrats in the House who wanted to make a point during the certification of the election, but Biden put an end to that very quickly, especially since they couldn't find one Senator to sign on to it.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2017/01/democrats-disrupt-trumps-electoral-college-certification.html
The reason why this was different in 2020, is because there were republicans in BOTH the house and the senate who were seriously trying to overturn the election based on lies and falsehoods, and the courts confirmed that there was no merit to that.
She was ahead of the whole country on the Aids crisis in the 80's, women's rights, gun control, etc. etc. etc.
and there is no doubt she will vote to convict when the Senate trial begins, just like she did the first time.
On almost all issues she votes the right way.
This will be her last term as Senator, and she has been a good Senator for the country and California
The point I was making is that I believe she was arguing from a procedural perspective not taking into consideration that what the republicans were trying to do was actually overturn the election.
In 2016 there were some Democrats in the House who wanted to make a point during the certification of the election, but Biden put an end to that very quickly, especially since they couldn't find one Senator to sign on to it.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2017/01/democrats-disrupt-trumps-electoral-college-certification.html
The reason why this was different in 2020, is because there were republicans in BOTH the house and the senate who were seriously trying to overturn the election based on lies and falsehoods, and the courts confirmed that there was no merit to that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
147 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Dianne Feinstein defends GOP senators' right to object to election results [View all]
ForgoTheConsequence
Jan 2021
OP
Its not about which side she is on, its about knowing what is right or wrong
Escurumbele
Jan 2021
#116
No, it's not about knowing which side she's on. It's about which side is on the side of
Nitram
Jan 2021
#140
I've wanted her out since her vote for Iraq Resolution for War under GWMcIdiot. n/t
aggiesal
Jan 2021
#44
I had the chance to interview Gavin Newsom at the Democratic Party Convention a few years back ...
aggiesal
Jan 2021
#98
Disagree with DiFi on this one. The GOPers had no right to block the counting of the
iluvtennis
Jan 2021
#69
I am only 73 and I can tell I am not to be trusted with making major decisions.
LiberalArkie
Jan 2021
#18
Just because you can doesn't mean you should. Feinstein was tone deaf on this one
Raven123
Jan 2021
#12
I doubt she'd run for re-election (2024), though apparently she's already filed paperwork ...
Auggie
Jan 2021
#55
Exactly. Some people shoot by the hip without thinking of the consequences. While her comments
still_one
Jan 2021
#27
She is messed up, and does not realize how un helpful her comments are on this. That nearly
still_one
Jan 2021
#17
not to mention the fact that the election system integrity has been tested harder than ever before
mdbl
Jan 2021
#112
She isn't going to resign, and her legislative actions have been always been progressive
still_one
Jan 2021
#119
She isn't going to resign. This will be her last term, and she has served the country and
still_one
Jan 2021
#126
Yes she is. Her votes where it counts now are on the right side. She will also vote to
still_one
Jan 2021
#135
She is speaking from a logical argument point of view. Unfortunately, she has missed the point
still_one
Jan 2021
#36
Cal has had some great Senators and but pushing 90 is pushing the bar.
friend of m and j
Jan 2021
#128
I'm surprised a place like San Francisco doesn't have someone like AOC to take part in a primary.
Crowman2009
Jan 2021
#85
This is why we need basic mental competency exams. Trump is an even better example.
flibbitygiblets
Jan 2021
#66
I think it's the whole "downplayed the importance of an upcoming impeachment trial for...
LudwigPastorius
Jan 2021
#89
Sorry, but I wont stop defending the Constitution. Its for everyone even the fools.
oldsoftie
Jan 2021
#117
The ability to do it and the proscribed method is right in the Constitution.
maxsolomon
Jan 2021
#95
Diane, there are valid objections, then there are baseless, seditious objections.
SunSeeker
Jan 2021
#97
She is seriously losing it. I think she might have some dementia going on.
BigDemVoter
Jan 2021
#101
Oh Lordee - get my fainitng couch and smelling salts. I can't take it anymore.
Peregrine Took
Jan 2021
#106
Jello Biafra called her out 35 years ago. She is not honorable IMHO. Sorry.
Evolve Dammit
Jan 2021
#109
You do not seem to be aware of some things. First of all it wasn't McConnell she hugged, it
still_one
Jan 2021
#124