Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(167,515 posts)
8. If you consider "senior" as "over 65" (or recently, 67, meaning anyone qualifiying for full SS)
Mon Feb 8, 2021, 02:39 PM
Feb 2021

then there are quite a few "seniors" who are full time teachers. That is why they are complaining. I know here in Philly, there were periods where they hired very few "new" teachers for decades and were only bringing in temps as needed to supplement the staff. And eventually they ended up with a shortage because few wanted to even go into teaching, and older teachers were retiring. They have had a hard time recruiting them now, so you have the same crew still there (who are now "seniors" ). I know a few teachers who were "brand new and/or young" when I graduated 40+ years ago and they are still there.

I know that DU is "boomer heavy" (I am a tail-end one), but many sortof skirt around being considered a "senior", even in their '70s (let alone mid-late '60s), while still working full time, and pointing at others as if they aren't "seniors" too.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Chicago mayor touts deal ...»Reply #8