Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JackN415

(924 posts)
19. It's sad really...
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 04:29 PM
Oct 2012

Never a surprise. This is a given. But it is sad when scientists have to be drawn in the political process.

Once upon a time, we had a two party-system; they competed with each other for power, but both were reasonably rational and respected the progress and enlightenment of mankind. Natural science is fundamentally apolitical. They might have ribbed each other on economic policy, but even a man like Nixon could declare: "I am now a Keynesian."

It signified rationalism, empiricism, embracing the truth and reality to formulate policy and take actions for progress, as opposed to being doctrinaire, dogmatic, and executing an agenda that adheres blindly to dangerous falsehood and beliefs with devastating consequence. It's the kind of folly and backwardness that we thought long gone and belongs only to human history.

It's sad for the Country when the intelligentsia that is dedicated to truth and progress for human without any political agenda has to side with one party more than the other. The GOP today reminds us that 21st century America is not that far from Soviet Lysenkoism 80 years ago, with disastrous consequence to the people.

The voters have very little choice now.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Will be denigrated by the RW in 3, 2, 1... freshwest Oct 2012 #1
Kick and R goclark Oct 2012 #2
Good! 'Cause mitthheadLies says the Science about Cha Oct 2012 #3
Which is among existentialist Oct 2012 #8
K&R silverweb Oct 2012 #4
Science! ellisonz Oct 2012 #5
Why did I read that... awoke_in_2003 Oct 2012 #6
Instead of investing in America, rightwingers... Beartracks Oct 2012 #7
science, schmience! central scrutinizer Oct 2012 #9
The REAL Noble prize winners! fujiyama Oct 2012 #10
Contrast 68 Nobels with the Republican Science Committee: Akin, Broun, Rohrabacher Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2012 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author JackN415 Oct 2012 #18
have not seen on MSM tv yet... keep up the tweets trailmonkee Oct 2012 #12
"What if it's a big hoax eyewall Oct 2012 #13
Oh Snap! lunatica Oct 2012 #22
It's a great cartoon and an international classic. eyewall Oct 2012 #23
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Oct 2012 #14
NY Times: "Among Nobel laureates, President Obama appears to have won by a landslide." bananas Oct 2012 #15
Here's the text of the letter bananas Oct 2012 #16
It's a given. Never a surprise. Democrat is the party of rationalism. JackN415 Oct 2012 #17
It's sad really... JackN415 Oct 2012 #19
Obama probably feels the same way when he has to debate mittens.. trailmonkee Oct 2012 #20
I was thinking, this is a real validation of Obama's choice for Science Advisor, John Holdren bananas Oct 2012 #21
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»68 Nobel Prize-Winning Sc...»Reply #19