Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bottomofthehill

(9,432 posts)
7. I am going to start by saying I am not an attorney
Wed Jun 23, 2021, 04:43 PM
Jun 2021

But for the life of me I do not understand why every person who was inside the building that day was not charged with this. It is clearly what they did and it is a felony.

See bold below

(a) Any violation of § 10-503.16(a), and any attempt to commit any such violation, shall be a felony punishable by a fine not exceeding $5,000, or imprisonment not exceeding 5 years, or both.

10–503.16. Unlawful conduct.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons:

(1) Except as authorized by regulations which shall be promulgated by the Capitol Police Board:

(A) To carry on or have readily accessible to the person of any individual upon the United States Capitol Grounds or within any of the Capitol Buildings any firearm, dangerous weapon, explosive, or incendiary device; or

(B) To discharge any firearm or explosive, to use any dangerous weapon, or to ignite any incendiary device, upon the United States Capitol Grounds or within any of the Capitol Buildings; or

(C) To transport by any means upon the United States Capitol Grounds or within any of the Capitol Buildings any explosive or incendiary device; or

(2) Knowingly, with force and violence, to enter or to remain upon the floor of either House of the Congress.

(b) It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons willfully and knowingly:

(1) To enter or to remain upon the floor of either House of the Congress, to enter or to remain in any cloakroom or lobby adjacent to such floor, or to enter or to remain in the Rayburn Room of the House or the Marble Room of the Senate, unless such person is authorized, pursuant to rules adopted by that House or pursuant to authorization given by that House, to enter or to remain upon such floor or in such cloakroom, lobby, or room;

(2) To enter or to remain in the gallery of either House of the Congress in violation of rules governing admission to such gallery adopted by that House or pursuant to authorization given by that House;

(3) To enter or to remain in any room within any of the Capitol Buildings set aside or designated for the use of either House of the Congress or any member, committee, subcommittee, officer, or employee of the Congress or either House thereof with intent to disrupt the orderly conduct of official business;

(4) To utter loud, threatening, or abusive language, or to engage in any disorderly or disruptive conduct, at any place upon the United States Capitol Grounds or within any of the Capitol Buildings with intent to impede, disrupt, or disturb the orderly conduct of any session of the Congress or either House thereof, or the orderly conduct within any such building of any hearing before, or any deliberations of, any committee or subcommittee of the Congress or either House thereof;

(5) To obstruct, or to impede passage through or within, the United States Capitol Grounds or any of the Capitol Buildings;

(6) To engage in any act of physical violence upon the United States Capitol Grounds or within any of the Capitol Buildings; or

(7) To parade, demonstrate, or picket within any of the Capitol Buildings.

(c) Nothing contained in this section shall forbid any act of any member of the Congress, or any employee of a member of the Congress, any officer or employee of the Congress or any committee or subcommittee thereof, or any officer or employee of either House of the Congress or any committee or subcommittee thereof, which is performed in the lawful discharge of his official duties.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I agree, yes there are PatSeg Jun 2021 #1
this sucks, its an insult to those who were there that day bottomofthehill Jun 2021 #2
This is all the prosecution asked for. Lasher Jun 2021 #4
I am going to start by saying I am not an attorney bottomofthehill Jun 2021 #7
She was an early cooperator. Her light sentence helps demonstrate to other POTENTIAL COOPERATORS pnwmom Jun 2021 #8
That's a very reasonable assessment Orrex Jun 2021 #34
I would be nice by giving her only 7 years at Florence. Lucky Luciano Jun 2021 #37
Then you might be discouraging others from cooperating. pnwmom Jun 2021 #40
7 years is better than 20! Lucky Luciano Jun 2021 #41
Nothing she did would have brought her 20 years. n/t pnwmom Jun 2021 #43
Reading the bold portion DVRacer Jun 2021 #62
This is probably Elessar Zappa Jun 2021 #5
Apparently she did a couple of days locked up when she was first Tomconroy Jun 2021 #3
40 hours of Community service..........she tried to over throw a duly elected government turbinetree Jun 2021 #6
Rake the Forest Traildogbob Jun 2021 #10
She should clean all 81 million voters toilets' for starters.... turbinetree Jun 2021 #13
She was an early cooperator. She probably gave the prosecutor valuable information. pnwmom Jun 2021 #12
I really have no empathy she knew exactly what she was doing, she wanted to throw out my vote your turbinetree Jun 2021 #15
I'm not suggesting you should have empathy. I'm saying that she probably made a deal pnwmom Jun 2021 #18
This was a misdemeanor FFS former9thward Jun 2021 #44
And $500 toward the $1.5 million in damages Mysterian Jun 2021 #16
Fry.Them.All. marble falls Jun 2021 #9
She was an early cooperator. She probably gave information useful to the prosecution. nt pnwmom Jun 2021 #11
I don't believe one word of her apology for a second. What magic thing shook her out of ... marble falls Jun 2021 #14
It doesn't matter. The prosecutor is showing her that he will offer probation pnwmom Jun 2021 #19
This woman seems to fall into the ignorant lemming category as opposed to the genuinely violent Vinca Jun 2021 #17
She is not cooperating with the government Tomconroy Jun 2021 #20
You can't say that. None of us know what cooperation she gave, but they did cite pnwmom Jun 2021 #42
She cooperated by describing her actions on that day Tomconroy Jun 2021 #58
Marcy Wheeler explained how that cooperation may have been more significant than you think. pnwmom Jun 2021 #63
The extent of her cooperation was made known to Tomconroy Jun 2021 #64
Yes, but not the extent of its VALUE to the prosecution. That we can't know. pnwmom Jun 2021 #65
The government would have informed the judge about the value of her cooperation. Tomconroy Jun 2021 #66
The government did. Not every detail must be made public. That could interfere pnwmom Jun 2021 #67
I don't know Marcy Wheeler, which means nothing. Tomconroy Jun 2021 #68
How do YOU know what the sentencing judge was informed about? nt pnwmom Jun 2021 #69
I tried. I give up. Dig up the transcript and Tomconroy Jun 2021 #70
Interesting stuff from the judge, a Reagan appointee. Tomconroy Jun 2021 #21
Pay for insurrection with a wag of the finger and a pat on the fanny Fullduplexxx Jun 2021 #22
Bullshit Scalded Nun Jun 2021 #23
Exactly! As if somebody shot a gun but missed Tiger8 Jun 2021 #30
We almost lost democracy. Very disappointing. Don't care if she had no record. Willing participant. Evolve Dammit Jun 2021 #24
Sorry, I have zero tolerance for attempting to overthrow the Federal government. Hard-liner here. NBachers Jun 2021 #25
Fine Should Have Been $10,000 To Help Pay For Damages DanieRains Jun 2021 #26
She was inside the building, if she did not push her way in (Attack) she would not have been there. bottomofthehill Jun 2021 #31
Everyone who set foot in the building should be charged with this, a felony charge bottomofthehill Jun 2021 #32
This is normal practice. They drop charges against low level criminals in order to gain their pnwmom Jun 2021 #38
She was never charged with a felony bottomofthehill Jun 2021 #48
She was there for 10 minutes and didn't go inside any of the important areas. pnwmom Jun 2021 #49
Right, she was at the door when first breached bottomofthehill Jun 2021 #51
She wasn't at the front. But she was in a position to see what was happening, and her phone pnwmom Jun 2021 #53
"...with the intent"... reACTIONary Jun 2021 #54
She was there for a stop the steal rally bottomofthehill Jun 2021 #56
l think that... reACTIONary Jun 2021 #59
Or with nearly 500 people charged, it's easier to take the path of least resistance. bottomofthehill Jun 2021 #60
"She came with the intent"... reACTIONary Jun 2021 #61
And to think, today Jesse Jackson was arrested on the spot Wednesdays Jun 2021 #27
wow--i hadn't heard that. grrrrr n/t orleans Jun 2021 #52
The DOJ recommended probation dalton99a Jun 2021 #28
Now they'll do it again iemanja Jun 2021 #29
I knew this would happen to the dumb dupes Warpy Jun 2021 #33
Disagree. I want many years in Florence CO for all of them. Solitary confinement and max PTSD. Lucky Luciano Jun 2021 #39
Nah, I'm old, really, really old. Warpy Jun 2021 #55
Her 40 hours of service should be spent tied to a Trump statue with her mouth on his ass. Rabrrrrrr Jun 2021 #35
Most are probably going to get probation oldsoftie Jun 2021 #36
If you've never been on probation . . . Richard D Jun 2021 #45
They're all traitors and should be imprisoned for decades. jcmaine72 Jun 2021 #46
My prediction was 80% probation/slap on wrist WarGamer Jun 2021 #47
I only want them to be treated as if they were POC. Dan Jun 2021 #50
And here she is: Woman Gets Probation In First Capitol Insurrection Sentencing - The 11th Hour MSNBC Rhiannon12866 Jun 2021 #57
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Indiana woman gets probat...»Reply #7