Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Justice Coney Barrett questions if adoption laws could eliminate the 'burden' of parenthood for abor [View all]SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)4. She's rich and has nannies.
She has no idea what poor, or even middle class women go through. Or rape victims go through. Or what it's like to carry a nonviable fetus to term against your will. And she was lucky with her pregnancies, they did not cause her medical complications, and she had a sedentary job that she could do while pregnant. And she had good health insurance. She has no idea what pregnancy means to the average woman or teen.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Justice Coney Barrett questions if adoption laws could eliminate the 'burden' of parenthood for abor [View all]
Polybius
Dec 2021
OP
Romania's "orphans" had a lot of psychological issues with abandonment and inability to attach, too
Hekate
Dec 2021
#86
dumbshit authoritarian asshole. she has such little love she thinks it's okay that
certainot
Dec 2021
#3
She's an asshole for even suggesting that a rape victim be FORCED to birth a rape baby.
Texin
Dec 2021
#44
Like the burden - yes, burden - of carrying a fetus for 10 months is nothing.
Solly Mack
Dec 2021
#7
Remember, she clerked for Scalia. So her mind is already made up, so she is just looking for ways
LT Barclay
Dec 2021
#8
The one who thinks it's just a matter of spit on a finger to tame the odd, unruly tress.
jaxexpat
Dec 2021
#23
irrelevant! postulates remedial legislation not in evidence, thus clearly not
bringthePaine
Dec 2021
#11
I had a friend who's Catholic. She and I had a debate about a phrase she said was in the bible.
jaxexpat
Dec 2021
#24
What's going to eliminate the 'burden' of pregnancy? Go back and try again, dear.
eShirl
Dec 2021
#21
She is an evil, rich loon. She does not give a shit about the average woman's burdens. nt
SunSeeker
Dec 2021
#22
Wow. Seven kids. Wonder how she managed that at home. Couldn't possibly work outside the home
Raven123
Dec 2021
#29
I think they WANT women to feel that guilt - whether or not they give up the child
csziggy
Dec 2021
#37
It isn't about adoption--it's about a woman's right to make her own medical decisions.
Lonestarblue
Dec 2021
#33
ABORTION and religion were the ONLY reasons this IDIOT was voted to the SC!
bluestarone
Dec 2021
#40
The adoptive parents-to-be should seek and be granted legal custody of the fetus up to and after the
keithbvadu2
Dec 2021
#56