Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JohnSJ

(92,190 posts)
6. It is even worse. Gorsuch and Alito were arguing on lies and false information. They stated in
Tue Dec 14, 2021, 07:53 AM
Dec 2021

their dissent that those wanting the exemption were NOT anti-vax, but just against the Covid vaccine, because it is from "fetal blood lines" from the 70's. That is a lie. It is TESTING that was done on those vaccines in the early development against those cell lines that were used to determine their feasibility, but the actual vaccine manufactured is NOT derived from any "fetal blood lines".

That Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas choice to accept the false premise demonstrates just how unhinged they are.

Some of the following over the counter medicines that were TESTED on derivative cell lines:

Advil, Aleve, Benadryl, Claritin, Ibuprofen, Motrin, Robitussin, Sudafed, Tylenol, Colace Lidocaine, Maalox, Mucinex, Mepyramine, Pepto-Bismol, Preparation H, Senna, Tums, Atorvastatin, Azithromycin, Amlodipine, Albuterol, Cerivastain, Canagliflozin, Dapagliflozin, Enbrel, Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, Levothyroxin, Losartan, Lisinopril, Metformin, Metoprolol, Oxbryta, Omeprazole, Remdesivir, Simvastatin, Sacubitril, Tenapanor

In other words, the use of fetal cell lines is very "common" in TESTING for many modern medicines

We have three SC justices who are out of their minds, and living in the dark ages. If it were up to these three SC judges views, a lot of medicines would be banned.



Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court declines to...»Reply #6