Latest Breaking News

Scrivener7

(59,451 posts)

29. Yes. But like with so many other things, no other President was ever so blatant in

Thu Feb 10, 2022, 09:20 AM

Feb 2022

violating those laws, so there aren't real consequences. At least that's what I got from the article. But, also from the article, I get the impression that they are working to create consequences for the future. That doesn't help us now, but for so many of these mores he has trampled, nothing is being done to prevent the next - smarter - guy from doing it worse. At least this may be tightened up.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

53 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Haberman book: Flushed papers found clogging Trump WH toilet [View all] riversedge Feb 2022 OP

2 things here, gab13by13 Feb 2022 #1

So, can't the DOJ subpoena hamsterjill Feb 2022 #2

"Patience grasshopper. It's not a Law and Order episode!" Scrivener7 Feb 2022 #5

And I'm no grasshopper either!!! LOL hamsterjill Feb 2022 #9

And peace back to you. Scrivener7 Feb 2022 #10

In order to move forward to "bring charges" BumRushDaShow Feb 2022 #37

I repeat, gab13by13 Feb 2022 #6

Didn't the National Archives just yesterday hamsterjill Feb 2022 #11

I saw it on Rachel gab13by13 Feb 2022 #16

The Washington Post doesn't mention Garland passing it, but they are stressing that the case would Scrivener7 Feb 2022 #26

I don't understand this, gab13by13 Feb 2022 #28

Yes. But like with so many other things, no other President was ever so blatant in Scrivener7 Feb 2022 #29

How is this law not applicable? Lonestarblue Feb 2022 #39

Seems to me the Law is there Farmer-Rick Feb 2022 #42

As a retired fed BumRushDaShow Feb 2022 #41

Here: Rhiannon12866 Feb 2022 #46

Maybe that would be preferable? Scrivener7 Feb 2022 #12

Yes, I was thinking the same thing. gab13by13 Feb 2022 #17

But even if that is the case, the DOJ still has to bring the case, right? Scrivener7 Feb 2022 #22

I think DOJ told the Inspector General to review Just_Vote_Dem Feb 2022 #27

Yes, I looked it up, gab13by13 Feb 2022 #30

No wonder Trump needed to flush his toilet 30 times. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2022 #3

Exactly! FM123 Feb 2022 #34

Well, THIS sent a chill down my spine: Scrivener7 Feb 2022 #4

Yep. That's what got my attention. How is this not a major national security breach? Walleye Feb 2022 #7

If he's remained in contact with Kim, gab13by13 Feb 2022 #8

Oh, God. You're right about Putin. Scrivener7 Feb 2022 #13

If Drumpf is still in touch with Putin... hkp11 Feb 2022 #18

Not going to happen, gab13by13 Feb 2022 #31

I hope so... hkp11 Feb 2022 #45

If Trump is in touch with foreign dictators PatSeg Feb 2022 #32

I can imagine Trump in court, " i ran out of toilet paper, what else was i supposed to use" Mr. Sparkle Feb 2022 #14

big fucking no-no. i happen to have a set of presidential papers up to the late 1800's. had a newer pansypoo53219 Feb 2022 #15

I have LBJ papers talking about JFK, gab13by13 Feb 2022 #19

i also found a govt memorial book for senator taft when he died. i read JFK's speech + mccarthy's. pansypoo53219 Feb 2022 #23

Looks like we may need a thorough cleansing of the DOJ and some significant codes changed. Samrob Feb 2022 #20

So did Trump flush White House documents gab13by13 Feb 2022 #21

Repugs sure liked the phrase "but her E-mails" KS Toronado Feb 2022 #24

Ha, ha, ha!!! PatSeg Feb 2022 #33

Proof of his butt server multigraincracker Feb 2022 #25

Throw the book at his YoshidaYui Feb 2022 #35

It may take me some time to flush this disgusting story from my mind. twodogsbarking Feb 2022 #36

I know, right?! BLEEEECH! Sigh. electric_blue68 Feb 2022 #50

INTENT!!! MissMillie Feb 2022 #38

Actually, he did burn some of them, gab13by13 Feb 2022 #40

library? Snoopy 7 Feb 2022 #43

Those Aren't Lapses DallasNE Feb 2022 #44

YUCK!!! llashram Feb 2022 #47

Why did Haberman wait to report this? LetMyPeopleVote Feb 2022 #48

Makes me wonder how many times plumbers were called to trump tower. calimary Feb 2022 #49

Deliberately, knowingly, maliciously, contemptuously. A mobster flushing evidence. Hekate Feb 2022 #51

Now we really have to wonder what this could be a damp piece of. Tactical Peek Feb 2022 #52

Photo still makes me smile. But hey! You're right! LuckyLib Feb 2022 #53