Latest Breaking News

LuckyLib

(7,052 posts)

53. Photo still makes me smile. But hey! You're right!

Reply to Tactical Peek (Reply #52)

Thu Feb 10, 2022, 06:17 PM

Feb 2022

It could be a piece of some classified document.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

53 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Haberman book: Flushed papers found clogging Trump WH toilet [View all] riversedge Feb 2022 OP

2 things here, gab13by13 Feb 2022 #1

So, can't the DOJ subpoena hamsterjill Feb 2022 #2

"Patience grasshopper. It's not a Law and Order episode!" Scrivener7 Feb 2022 #5

And I'm no grasshopper either!!! LOL hamsterjill Feb 2022 #9

And peace back to you. Scrivener7 Feb 2022 #10

In order to move forward to "bring charges" BumRushDaShow Feb 2022 #37

I repeat, gab13by13 Feb 2022 #6

Didn't the National Archives just yesterday hamsterjill Feb 2022 #11

I saw it on Rachel gab13by13 Feb 2022 #16

The Washington Post doesn't mention Garland passing it, but they are stressing that the case would Scrivener7 Feb 2022 #26

I don't understand this, gab13by13 Feb 2022 #28

Yes. But like with so many other things, no other President was ever so blatant in Scrivener7 Feb 2022 #29

How is this law not applicable? Lonestarblue Feb 2022 #39

Seems to me the Law is there Farmer-Rick Feb 2022 #42

As a retired fed BumRushDaShow Feb 2022 #41

Here: Rhiannon12866 Feb 2022 #46

Maybe that would be preferable? Scrivener7 Feb 2022 #12

Yes, I was thinking the same thing. gab13by13 Feb 2022 #17

But even if that is the case, the DOJ still has to bring the case, right? Scrivener7 Feb 2022 #22

I think DOJ told the Inspector General to review Just_Vote_Dem Feb 2022 #27

Yes, I looked it up, gab13by13 Feb 2022 #30

No wonder Trump needed to flush his toilet 30 times. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2022 #3

Exactly! FM123 Feb 2022 #34

Well, THIS sent a chill down my spine: Scrivener7 Feb 2022 #4

Yep. That's what got my attention. How is this not a major national security breach? Walleye Feb 2022 #7

If he's remained in contact with Kim, gab13by13 Feb 2022 #8

Oh, God. You're right about Putin. Scrivener7 Feb 2022 #13

If Drumpf is still in touch with Putin... hkp11 Feb 2022 #18

Not going to happen, gab13by13 Feb 2022 #31

I hope so... hkp11 Feb 2022 #45

If Trump is in touch with foreign dictators PatSeg Feb 2022 #32

I can imagine Trump in court, " i ran out of toilet paper, what else was i supposed to use" Mr. Sparkle Feb 2022 #14

big fucking no-no. i happen to have a set of presidential papers up to the late 1800's. had a newer pansypoo53219 Feb 2022 #15

I have LBJ papers talking about JFK, gab13by13 Feb 2022 #19

i also found a govt memorial book for senator taft when he died. i read JFK's speech + mccarthy's. pansypoo53219 Feb 2022 #23

Looks like we may need a thorough cleansing of the DOJ and some significant codes changed. Samrob Feb 2022 #20

So did Trump flush White House documents gab13by13 Feb 2022 #21

Repugs sure liked the phrase "but her E-mails" KS Toronado Feb 2022 #24

Ha, ha, ha!!! PatSeg Feb 2022 #33

Proof of his butt server multigraincracker Feb 2022 #25

Throw the book at his YoshidaYui Feb 2022 #35

It may take me some time to flush this disgusting story from my mind. twodogsbarking Feb 2022 #36

I know, right?! BLEEEECH! Sigh. electric_blue68 Feb 2022 #50

INTENT!!! MissMillie Feb 2022 #38

Actually, he did burn some of them, gab13by13 Feb 2022 #40

library? Snoopy 7 Feb 2022 #43

Those Aren't Lapses DallasNE Feb 2022 #44

YUCK!!! llashram Feb 2022 #47

Why did Haberman wait to report this? LetMyPeopleVote Feb 2022 #48

Makes me wonder how many times plumbers were called to trump tower. calimary Feb 2022 #49

Deliberately, knowingly, maliciously, contemptuously. A mobster flushing evidence. Hekate Feb 2022 #51

Now we really have to wonder what this could be a damp piece of. Tactical Peek Feb 2022 #52

Photo still makes me smile. But hey! You're right! LuckyLib Feb 2022 #53