Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm sorry, I can't help it, gab13by13 Feb 2022 #1
How do you know the DoJ isn't investigating? Ocelot II Feb 2022 #2
thank you...that's what I've been saying for months agingdem Feb 2022 #7
And you know the DOJ is NOT investigating, because....why? brooklynite Feb 2022 #3
Because their broken crystal ball told then so emulatorloo Feb 2022 #21
Likewise ... though I'm certainly glad they are. I'm also hopeful that Garland is actually doing KPN Feb 2022 #12
DOJ is supposed to be independent of the President. Barr's and Trump's perversion of that was not emulatorloo Feb 2022 #22
I understand and orinarily I would fully agree. But these are not ordinary times. KPN Feb 2022 #25
The Courts have been quite clear melm00se Feb 2022 #4
Isn't that negated when there are future crimines involved? csziggy Feb 2022 #17
yes but the bar for this is pretty darn high melm00se Feb 2022 #23
Wouldn't it be fairly east to show that the situation did exist at the time it occurred. There is KPN Feb 2022 #26
Try telling the authorities they can't execute a search warrant rsdsharp Feb 2022 #27
There is not much you can do while it is being executed melm00se Feb 2022 #28
And if the warrant is not defective, and it rarely is, rsdsharp Feb 2022 #29
But his e-mails. L. Coyote Feb 2022 #5
A lawyer can't use attorney-client privilege to cover up a crime if he was involved in it. Ocelot II Feb 2022 #6
Good point. His plan to overturn the election should be viewed as an illegal act oldsoftie Feb 2022 #10
Excellent points PatSeg Feb 2022 #11
Exactly! Eastman is involved in the cover up no doubt PortTack Feb 2022 #14
Isn't there a way for a neutral party to examine each dcument an determine LastLiberal in PalmSprings Feb 2022 #8
The judge would do that. Ocelot II Feb 2022 #20
Why isn't the review being handled by a special master? bucolic_frolic Feb 2022 #9
Good question! nt csziggy Feb 2022 #18
Has he offered documentation that Trump was actually his client? C_U_L8R Feb 2022 #13
They are running the damn clock out... Historic NY Feb 2022 #15
The judge-approved "review" sounds like an opportunity to destroy evidence. ancianita Feb 2022 #16
U.S. District Court Judge James Carter: looked up all the circuit & district judges, can't find him. ancianita Feb 2022 #19
Don't Understand The 27,000 Being Withheld DallasNE Feb 2022 #24
Trump was the client? Show me the retainer check. Grins Feb 2022 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»John Eastman claims attor...»Reply #27