Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

LetMyPeopleVote

(177,624 posts)

25. Who is surprised by this?

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Mar 18, 2022, 01:33 PM

Mar 2022

Only idiots/RWNJs believed that this treatment worked

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ivermectin didn't protect people from COVID-19, study shows [View all] brooklynite Mar 2022 OP

*shocked Pikachu face* nt bluevoter4life Mar 2022 #1

Yeah a big newsflash from the NoShit Dept. bullimiami Mar 2022 #3

They have. I get electronic spam and junk mail from them all the time. Runningdawg Mar 2022 #15

"'Sample size', 'double blind', 'peer review', and reporting conflicts of interest are backdoors to ck4829 Mar 2022 #2

Yeah! Do some RESEARCH. keithbvadu2 Mar 2022 #11

It's all just part of Mz Pip Mar 2022 #4

I'm shocked. Aristus Mar 2022 #5

Me too. Well, not that shocked. Ray Bruns Mar 2022 #7

Think I'll slip this one into the "Well, NO!" file. paleotn Mar 2022 #6

But, did the researchers follow the protocols published on the INTERNET? NCjack Mar 2022 #8

Those researchers are in the pocket of big vaccine and big mask IronLionZion Mar 2022 #9

re: Ivermectin didn't protect... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2022 #10

Ivermectin has laxative action all by itself jmowreader Mar 2022 #22

IMO... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2022 #23

But at least they got rid of their tapeworms and fleas. Ocelot II Mar 2022 #12

surprise surprise !!! vlyons Mar 2022 #13

Good news. lagomorph777 Mar 2022 #14

Well, they are all full of shit anyway louis-t Mar 2022 #35

Well it's Rebl2 Mar 2022 #16

More dead MAGAT voters. lagomorph777 Mar 2022 #17

What a wa$te. live love laugh Mar 2022 #18

No bnefit in treatment, either Warpy Mar 2022 #19

Duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh krispos42 Mar 2022 #20

I found out my shrink has been doing ivermectin and had done HCQ. moriah Mar 2022 #21

I think in Rebl2 Mar 2022 #24

Nonsense; all they have to do is say prescribing it is against their sincerely held religious belief brooklynite Mar 2022 #32

Good answer Rebl2 Mar 2022 #33

Who is surprised by this? LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2022 #25

On the plus side, the ones who lived don't have worms. Vinca Mar 2022 #26

I'm shocked, SHOCKED! Well... not that shocked. Initech Mar 2022 #27

"Thanks, but I'll do my own research". /s Jetheels Mar 2022 #28

That will be good for hospitals lees1975 Mar 2022 #29

Say what you will, but this study didn't follow the protocol of the doctors who found it effective. TheRickles Mar 2022 #30

Of course it didn't! sakabatou Mar 2022 #31

I just bought the liquid version... tonekat Mar 2022 #34

Even worse, the users will gain weight as they have now lost their 'natural' worm flora JCMach1 Mar 2022 #36

I point these kind of studies out to RWers TheFarseer Mar 2022 #37