Latest Breaking News

TigressDem

(5,125 posts)

19. NOT GOOD

Mon Sep 5, 2022, 12:17 PM

Sep 2022

the Court also temporarily enjoins the Government from reviewing and using the seized materials for investigative purposes
pending completion of the special master’s review or further Court order.

IF IN ANY OF HIS "PERSONAL or ATTY PRIVILEGED ITEMS" he basically confesses to wrong doing... those can be removed and he can hold up use of the findings.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

148 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge grants Trump bid for special master in document search [View all] BumRushDaShow Sep 2022 OP

Here's the document. pnwmom Sep 2022 #1

NOT GOOD TigressDem Sep 2022 #19

I wish to believe that Garland anticipated this from a MAGAT judge and will take immediate in2herbs Sep 2022 #26

Yes yes and yes n/t Lulu KC Sep 2022 #73

We're in it now. Joinfortmill Sep 2022 #92

I seriously doubt he can. Or will try Evolve Dammit Sep 2022 #105

Not if there's a crime committed Novara Sep 2022 #29

Questions of attorney/client privilege are normally brought up during a trial or via pre-trial in2herbs Sep 2022 #80

This will blueknight73 Sep 2022 #109

And then on to the SCOTUS, where... Wednesdays Sep 2022 #113

We need to win in November and then expand SCOTUS NYC Liberal Sep 2022 #116

Do they really want to open it up to where VMA131Marine Sep 2022 #119

This current SCOTUS will twist themselves into a pretzel Wednesdays Sep 2022 #123

Theoretically, criminal evidence can't have privilege William Seger Sep 2022 #79

Rich crybaby little boys always get what they want. That's the American way Walleye Sep 2022 #2

Putin isn't a crybaby. gab13by13 Sep 2022 #11

That's pretty good. I forgot Putin appointed this judge Walleye Sep 2022 #27

I used to post on my local Magat web site, gab13by13 Sep 2022 #52

Yes the truth is like kryptonite to the Republican Party Walleye Sep 2022 #54

Review for "attorney-client and/or executive privilege" lostnfound Sep 2022 #3

The person who currently holds executive privilege is Joseph R. Biden. Lonestarblue Sep 2022 #35

Yes the DOJ can appeal. Either side was probably going to appeal and this, in effect, helps DJT kelly1mm Sep 2022 #69

Her opinion is pretty broad, and very bad for us. Calista241 Sep 2022 #134

This is the Big Lie for legally and successfully executed search warrants, thanks Judge Idiot bucolic_frolic Sep 2022 #4

Of course she did. Judge shopping. LoisB Sep 2022 #5

How peculiar for this judge to announce her decision on a holiday. n/t SoFloDenny Sep 2022 #14

I didn't think about that but you're right, that is odd. LoisB Sep 2022 #18

Actually, she announced her decision EndlessWire Sep 2022 #89

Is anyone surprised? More delay and more time for Republican's to message on the jalan48 Sep 2022 #6

Not surprised one iota. hamsterjill Sep 2022 #41

Yes, the longer the delay the more time for Republican's to propagandize. The outrage at jalan48 Sep 2022 #49

yep llashram Sep 2022 #86

It is nice to be able to hand-select your own judge from among your appointees. That Presidency Chainfire Sep 2022 #7

others have pointed out this was a random selection, but.... getagrip_already Sep 2022 #88

"It's good to be king!" Nasruddin Sep 2022 #97

The Next Thing kairos12 Sep 2022 #8

I agree, gab13by13 Sep 2022 #55

This message was self-deleted by its author Chainfire Sep 2022 #9

And tRump just keeps on winning. old guy Sep 2022 #10

No, he doesn't keep on winning, and he faces multiple investigations. CBHagman Sep 2022 #39

He may not be winning, but he is not in jail for his crimes. Ferrets are Cool Sep 2022 #62

Lucky for him he's not been treated like a Black man sellimg indiv cigs on corner SheltieLover Sep 2022 #66

Yes, that was a shame on our country. Joinfortmill Sep 2022 #95

Exacly msfiddlestix Sep 2022 #143

✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ n/t msfiddlestix Sep 2022 #144

Hey Judge, Trump doesn't have "Executive Privilege" emulatorloo Sep 2022 #12

Even if he did, you can't claim executive privilege against the executive, rsdsharp Sep 2022 #68

Right, and DOJ carefully explained that to her in their filing. emulatorloo Sep 2022 #70

She's repaying her debt! atreides1 Sep 2022 #81

She owes them nothing, she is supposed to be impartial and uphold the law. emulatorloo Sep 2022 #84

Plenty of them did uphold the law atreides1 Sep 2022 #94

"The appointment may (will) slow the pace of the department's investigation." Botany Sep 2022 #13

A disappointing number of Democrats voted FOR her, or didn't vote at all. FoxNewsSucks Sep 2022 #112

So arrest him NOW. According to all reports there is enough evidence to arrest him on in2herbs Sep 2022 #15

No surprise yankee87 Sep 2022 #16

I'm thinking...so what? agingdem Sep 2022 #17

There was a former case in the USSC that Thomas was a decider on and he discussed in2herbs Sep 2022 #32

It will be tough to bring an indictment without evidence.... getagrip_already Sep 2022 #34

the DOJ has the evidence... agingdem Sep 2022 #75

but they can't present it to a gj or likely, in a court..... getagrip_already Sep 2022 #83

As of today, the order appointing the Special Master also precludes the DOJ from using those kelly1mm Sep 2022 #126

Garland will appeal and soon agingdem Sep 2022 #127

Yes, the DOJ will probably appeal and it will most likely go through the 11th Circuit (R leaning) kelly1mm Sep 2022 #131

Doesn't matter. Closing the barn door when the horse is in the next county. paleotn Sep 2022 #20

Tell that to our overseas intelligence agents, gab13by13 Sep 2022 #30

A quick stay and then slapped down on appeal, but regardless,.... paleotn Sep 2022 #37

I REALLY hope this isn't an open-ended thing packman Sep 2022 #21

Here we are at DU gab13by13 Sep 2022 #22

It's a failure of imagination all over again by these "experts." /nt spudspud Sep 2022 #98

About Judge Cannon Ponietz Sep 2022 #23

And who says crime doesn't pay! peppertree Sep 2022 #43

Lock the Special Master in a SCIF with a bottle of water Submariner Sep 2022 #24

"it is unlikely to affect any investigative decisions or the ultimate outcome of the probe." brooklynite Sep 2022 #25

Who is Eric Tucker? I never heard of him. Is he a Republican? gab13by13 Sep 2022 #51

That is only true if we win in 2024 dsc Sep 2022 #130

Expect this TrumpTweet in just a few days after the SM starts working jmowreader Sep 2022 #28

Yup. orangecrush Sep 2022 #38

Don't know what to think orangecrush Sep 2022 #31

I'm sure there Appeal is 90% done.... getagrip_already Sep 2022 #44

Trump appointed judge comes through for Trump. Gives him a massive delay in a criminal investigation Baitball Blogger Sep 2022 #33

2 Questions BlueIdaho Sep 2022 #36

Who appoints the special master people Sep 2022 #108

So the Trump appointed Judge will appoint a SM... BlueIdaho Sep 2022 #111

Meaningless. The DOJ has already looked at everything they took. oldsoftie Sep 2022 #40

She ordered the doj to stop using info to prosecute.... getagrip_already Sep 2022 #45

Nope. Novara Sep 2022 #50

isn't the grand jury an investigation forum? getagrip_already Sep 2022 #85

They can still search his other properties too VMA131Marine Sep 2022 #120

I'm hoping that, IF there was ever a time for a fast appeal (FINAL appeal) bluestarone Sep 2022 #42

Guys, this isn't for executive privilege - he doesn't have that. This is for ... Novara Sep 2022 #46

uhmm, no, she specifically said for EP...... getagrip_already Sep 2022 #93

Doesn't matter what this idiot judge SAID, executive privilege rests with the executive, Joe Biden Novara Sep 2022 #141

This ruling will be appealed LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2022 #47

She wants to advance as a judge in future R administrations and wouldn't Tadpole Raisin Sep 2022 #48

Fuck this shit. (nt) Paladin Sep 2022 #53

Well said, gab13by13 Sep 2022 #59

So outrageous, judge should be recused from case wildman76 Sep 2022 #56

Can a judge Traildogbob Sep 2022 #63

A Judge that was appointed AFTER TRUMP LOST Heather MC Sep 2022 #57

McConnell put her there as a safety valve Ponietz Sep 2022 #58

Mcconnell is worst than Trump. Heather MC Sep 2022 #61

Trump will have a hayday with this. Kablooie Sep 2022 #60

There is no such thing fof high level classified material SheltieLover Sep 2022 #64

indict him for obstruction now moonshinegnomie Sep 2022 #65

AGREED. Clearly an Obstruction of Justice case. Justice matters. Sep 2022 #99

Ami I correct in believing the affidavit request was ignored? Raven123 Sep 2022 #67

If he has personal documents intermingled ET Awful Sep 2022 #71

Ya think??!! WestMichRad Sep 2022 #87

She'll probably appoint Putin orangecrush Sep 2022 #72

has to be someone not connected to either party.... getagrip_already Sep 2022 #91

She's gonna pick the SM EndlessWire Sep 2022 #102

I'm sure Garland anticipated this orangecrush Sep 2022 #106

Well well well. colorado_ufo Sep 2022 #74

SSDD mn9driver Sep 2022 #76

Well that sucks! vlyons Sep 2022 #77

Popehat discusses the decision at length (well, for a Twitter account). mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2022 #78

Supreme Court Nasruddin Sep 2022 #96

Hey, I have an idea! orangecrush Sep 2022 #82

Doubling down every time is the only sensible strategy Ponietz Sep 2022 #100

I'm sure Garland anticipated this orangecrush Sep 2022 #104

+1. Just do it. dalton99a Sep 2022 #122

LOCK HER UP...........Judge Aileen Cannon KS Toronado Sep 2022 #90

I believe the proper spelling is Judge Aileen Qannon. nt SunSeeker Sep 2022 #133

Sorry my mistake, I'll do better next time. KS Toronado Sep 2022 #136

Corrupt judge lees1975 Sep 2022 #101

Very hard to prove though Polybius Sep 2022 #115

Appoint a special master to review her bank accounts and contacts on this case GreenWave Sep 2022 #103

This orangecrush Sep 2022 #107

"What. Is The Harm" DallasNE Sep 2022 #110

I've heard of thank-you notes. But THIS is ridiculous! calimary Sep 2022 #114

Fuck it arrest the asshole now! BlueJac Sep 2022 #117

Unfrickingbelieveable ificandream Sep 2022 #118

Look, the military, the CIA, the FBI and Garland will never allow a special master to look at all.. machoneman Sep 2022 #121

The SCOTUS: "Hold my beer!" Wednesdays Sep 2022 #124

The judge should clearly have recused herself from the case as she cstanleytech Sep 2022 #125

Nope. onenote Sep 2022 #147

Fine I will amend it and say in my opinion she should have recused herself from the case as her cstanleytech Sep 2022 #148

Trump will get a happy ending from this one dalton99a Sep 2022 #128

Does Hillary Clinton still have her security clearance? Bayard Sep 2022 #129

MAGAt intimidation of an ignorant judge appeared to work, in this case n/t AntiFascist Sep 2022 #132

No intimidation. She is MAGA Trash herself JI7 Sep 2022 #137

She is also a pure IDIOT! This is the idiocracy many of us were concerned about... AntiFascist Sep 2022 #139

Delay, then claim "deep state special master" 867-5309. Sep 2022 #135

Judge Aileen Cannon is a member of the Taint Team. LudwigPastorius Sep 2022 #138

We need another judge to look at this. truthisfreedom Sep 2022 #140

And he slithers away again. zanana1 Sep 2022 #142

Copied from someone many months ago. "The Judiciary branch is strong and will hold." spike jones Sep 2022 #145

Cool UT_democrat Sep 2022 #146