Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: McCarthy says Santos will be seated on committees [View all]BumRushDaShow
(172,047 posts)16. Confirming IronLionZion
Here is an article about it -
When it comes to security clearances, rules for others dont apply to Congress
By John M. Donnelly
Posted January 12, 2021 at 3:55pm
Lawmakers are privy to some of the countrys most sensitive information, from domestic terrorism threats to military operations overseas, regularly receiving briefings in secure rooms in the Capitol complex from federal and military officials with high-level clearances.
But in the wake of the Jan. 6 riots at the Capitol, some are asking whether certain members of Congress, including Republican leaders of defense and intelligence panels, would meet even the minimum standards for a government official to hold a security clearance. Being cleared requires allegiance to the U.S. Government and Constitution of the United States at a bare minimum, Rep. Ruben Gallego, an Arizona Democrat who serves on the House Armed Services Committee and who fought with the Marine Corps in Iraq, said in a statement to CQ Roll Call.
Unlike officials at federal agencies, lawmakers do not have security clearances per se, experts said. Rather, members of Congress are by tradition deemed inherently trustworthy by dint of the offices they hold, although they are subject to punishment under the House ethics code for revealing classified information. The maximum penalty, which would require a two-thirds vote by the House, is expulsion.
Neither their fellow lawmakers nor any president could take that fundamental presumption of trustworthiness away from them. If they remain Members, then they retain eligibility for access to classified information, Steven Aftergood, a leading expert on government secrecy with the Federation of American Scientists, said in an email. But if they engaged in constitutionally prohibited actions, then they should be expelled from Congress altogether.
(snip)
https://rollcall.com/2021/01/12/when-it-comes-to-security-clearances-rules-for-others-dont-apply-to-congress/
By John M. Donnelly
Posted January 12, 2021 at 3:55pm
Lawmakers are privy to some of the countrys most sensitive information, from domestic terrorism threats to military operations overseas, regularly receiving briefings in secure rooms in the Capitol complex from federal and military officials with high-level clearances.
But in the wake of the Jan. 6 riots at the Capitol, some are asking whether certain members of Congress, including Republican leaders of defense and intelligence panels, would meet even the minimum standards for a government official to hold a security clearance. Being cleared requires allegiance to the U.S. Government and Constitution of the United States at a bare minimum, Rep. Ruben Gallego, an Arizona Democrat who serves on the House Armed Services Committee and who fought with the Marine Corps in Iraq, said in a statement to CQ Roll Call.
Unlike officials at federal agencies, lawmakers do not have security clearances per se, experts said. Rather, members of Congress are by tradition deemed inherently trustworthy by dint of the offices they hold, although they are subject to punishment under the House ethics code for revealing classified information. The maximum penalty, which would require a two-thirds vote by the House, is expulsion.
Neither their fellow lawmakers nor any president could take that fundamental presumption of trustworthiness away from them. If they remain Members, then they retain eligibility for access to classified information, Steven Aftergood, a leading expert on government secrecy with the Federation of American Scientists, said in an email. But if they engaged in constitutionally prohibited actions, then they should be expelled from Congress altogether.
(snip)
https://rollcall.com/2021/01/12/when-it-comes-to-security-clearances-rules-for-others-dont-apply-to-congress/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Do these people have background checks for certain committees like intel or defense?
IronLionZion
Jan 2023
#4
From what I've read most if not all of the Biden docs have been "classified" not TS or other. So
in2herbs
Jan 2023
#24
Do House committee assignments require security clearances? Because you know that Santos
LaMouffette
Jan 2023
#5
Thanks for the info, Bumrushdashow and IronZionLion! I think it's time to ditch tradition
LaMouffette
Jan 2023
#59
Kevin along Scalise & Paul Ryan were well aware of Putin's work to install Trump in 2016
Botany
Jan 2023
#51
Yes, is he a U.S. citizen. If not born here, did he lie as he applied for citizenship? If he did...
machoneman
Jan 2023
#30
Right before the debate about the debt limit, a (D) should request for a removal from speakership ..
aggiesal
Jan 2023
#21
The next speaker might not have the agreements to withhold debt limit vote on the floor. n/t
aggiesal
Jan 2023
#46
Dude wouldn't pass a background check, but Kevin will seat him on committees.
SunSeeker
Jan 2023
#28
So they are going to put him on Intelligence...... curious minds want to know....
turbinetree
Jan 2023
#29
Propaganda and disinformation committee along with the kiss putins ass committee. nt
yaesu
Jan 2023
#49
Embattled Rep. Santos awarded seats on Science and Small Business committees
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
Jan 2023
#57