Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LenaBaby61

(6,991 posts)
22. Robert's wife is a crook .... Whose surprised?
Sat Apr 22, 2023, 08:13 PM
Apr 2023
Robert's is not going to stop his grift.


Chief Justice Roberts’ Wife Is Latest Supreme Court Spouse To Spark Ethics Concerns.

The wife of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts is facing scrutiny for potential conflict of interests after a former colleague warned the Justice Department and Congress about her role as a recruiter for law firms, the New York Times reports, the latest ethical issue to face the court after Justice Clarence Thomas’ wife already came under fire for potential conflicts.
Chief Justice John Roberts and wife Jane Sullivan Roberts Supreme Court
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts and his wife Jane Sullivan Roberts arrive at the ... [+]GETTY IMAGES
KEY FACTS
Jane Sullivan Roberts, a legal recruiter, has earned “millions” in commissions for recruiting attorneys for jobs at law firms, which include firms that have cases before the Supreme Court, her former colleague Kendal Price said, according to a letter obtained by the Times.

Price provided records to the federal government showing commissions the justice’s wife earned between 2007 and 2014, and asked for an inquiry into the matter, arguing it should be mandatory for justices to disclose information about their spouses’ work.

Price sued Jane Sullivan Roberts in 2014 after he was fired from her recruiting firm—the suit ended in arbitration a year later, and the attorney who represented Price in his suit against Roberts and her firm, James E. O’Connell, Jr., has not yet responded to a request for comment.

Price did not cite specific cases that are of particular concern to the chief justice’s work, but cited Jane Sullivan Roberts placing Obama-era Interior Secretary Ken Salazar at WilmerHale, a large law firm that has argued more than 125 cases at the high court, as an example, the Times reports.

The chief justice has never recused himself from a case due to his wife and does not disclose her clients or earnings on financial disclosures, according to the Times, only reporting her salary but not commissions—but Price argued that’s misleading, as commissions “depend on cultivating and capitalizing on relationships in order to consummate particular deals.”

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2023/01/31/chief-justice-roberts-wife-is-latest-supreme-court-spouse-to-spark-ethics-concerns/?sh=1c348595bb80


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Birds of a feather stick together? Evolve Dammit Apr 2023 #1
I was gonna say Quanto Magnus Apr 2023 #18
"Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men"? The Shadow knows. (old TV, but applicable)..nt Evolve Dammit Apr 2023 #24
And then Quanto Magnus May 2023 #54
Whose pockets have been generous to the Chief Justice? marble falls Apr 2023 #2
That's the first... 2naSalit Apr 2023 #14
Good question ck4829 Apr 2023 #50
What about the real estate deal? Shouldn't that have been reported, Johnny? mobeau69 Apr 2023 #3
Hard to be certain, despite the reporting on the subject FBaggins Apr 2023 #7
He listed a 1/3 interest on his 2014 disclosure form as a rental property, not a personal residence. pnwmom Apr 2023 #27
Who is paying for Roberts vacations or his mother's house ? ...nt Jarqui Apr 2023 #4
Who's paying Roberts' wife? SunSeeker Apr 2023 #32
Stunning, sure does raise suspicions of what's going on with Roberts now, too bucolic_frolic Apr 2023 #5
Unprofessional Chicken Shit. Cha Apr 2023 #6
Truly ck4829 Apr 2023 #49
Of course he does Marthe48 Apr 2023 #8
no matter Layzeebeaver Apr 2023 #9
Unsurprising. (nt) Paladin Apr 2023 #10
Roberts needs to have Thomas Turbineguy Apr 2023 #11
He messed up his own legacy long ago. dchill Apr 2023 #21
Who is surprised by this? LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2023 #12
I'd like to know what the law was when he left them out. jimfields33 Apr 2023 #13
Same here .... anciano Apr 2023 #16
Why do you think Dick Durbin is incompetent? ... marble falls Apr 2023 #35
Got any more doubts about Dick Durbin? marble falls Apr 2023 #52
Colour me sooooooo NOT surprised. niyad Apr 2023 #15
More than a little disingenuous, isn't he? madamesilverspurs Apr 2023 #17
what crap! (not the op -- i mean john roberts crap) i googled the judicial conference committee orleans Apr 2023 #19
Good info, thanks! BigmanPigman Apr 2023 #26
Ethics being what they are... dchill Apr 2023 #20
The Substandard Court. ck4829 Apr 2023 #48
Robert's wife is a crook .... Whose surprised? LenaBaby61 Apr 2023 #22
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2023 #25
She has made millions in commissions from companies with cases before her husband's court. NullTuples Apr 2023 #37
this is not surprising republianmushroom Apr 2023 #23
Politicians in robes PSPS Apr 2023 #28
Imagine Johnny's deal if Clearance cashing in like that. czarjak Apr 2023 #29
As Gomer Pyle used to say... surprise, surprise, surprise!! InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2023 #30
Thomas should not need any 3rd party guidelines to behave ethically. cstanleytech Apr 2023 #31
What investigative powers does the Judicial Conference have? SunSeeker Apr 2023 #33
There is no question left as to the bias exhibited by the SCOTUS SouthernDem4ever Apr 2023 #34
Indeed ck4829 Apr 2023 #47
Isn't Roberts also the presiding officer of the Judicial Conference? NullTuples Apr 2023 #36
Impeach, Impeach, Impeach!!! hydrolastic Apr 2023 #38
Did you learn nothing from the TFG impeachments ExWhoDoesntCare Apr 2023 #40
do you understand the mechanics of ... RussBLib Apr 2023 #41
Just send Roberts a subpoena Bluejeans Apr 2023 #39
Yep ck4829 Apr 2023 #46
You'd think a guy who claims the SCOTUS should be seen above Hassler Apr 2023 #42
You'd think a guy who claims the SCOTUS should be seen above Hassler Apr 2023 #43
Right? ck4829 Apr 2023 #45
Weak ck4829 Apr 2023 #44
Just-Us Droid Kid Berwyn Apr 2023 #51
I would say that Justice Roberts' melm00se Apr 2023 #53
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Chief Justice John Robert...»Reply #22