Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(166,572 posts)
28. That vote was actually for a motion to send this matter to Committee
Thu May 18, 2023, 01:09 PM
May 2023
and was NOT an actual vote on the privileged resolution to expel or not.

All actions - https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-resolution/114/all-actions?overview=closed#tabs

Date All Actions

05/17/2023-5:38pm Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

05/17/2023-5:38pm On motion to refer Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 221 - 204, 7 Present ) (Roll No. 217).

05/17/2023-5:04pm The previous question on the motion to refer was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H2401)

05/17/2023-5:03pm Mr. D'Esposito moved to refer to Ethics
.

05/17/2023-5:02pm DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 114.

05/17/2023-5:02pm Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H2401; text: CR H2401)

05/17/2023-5:02pm QUESTION OF THE PRIVILEGES OF THE HOUSE - Mr. Robert Garcia (CA) rose to a question of the privileges of the House and offered the resolution. The Chair directed the Clerk to report the resolution. Upon examination of the resolution, the Chair determined that the resolution did constitute a question of the privileges of the House.

05/16/2023-2:18pm NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO OFFER RESOLUTION - Mr. Robert Garcia (CA) notified the House of his intent to offer a privileged resolution pursuant to clause 2(a)(1) of rule IX. The Chair announced that a determination will be made at the time designated for consideration of the resolution.

02/09/2023 Referred to the House Committee on Ethics.

02/09/2023 Introduced in House


Once that motion was made, seconded, a vote was ordered, and the motion was approved, then that action deep-sixed the original, underlying resolution. If the motion had failed by a majority vote, then they would have gone on to vote on the actual resolution.

This is pretty common procedure where quite a few bills or resolutions have someone complain and request through a motion, that it be referred to Committee, and those requests are often shunted aside by failing, and they go on and do their final votes.

This was the actual resolution -

H.Res.114 - In the matter of George Santos.

By doing what they did with respect to the MOTION, Democrats on that Committee remove what would easily be a GOP talking point that they are "biased".

IOW, it's one of many "tricks" (tools) that Congress has to do their work and if they have good advisors with knowledge of Parliamentary procedure, then they can find ways to do what they want.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They just bought him. Turbineguy May 2023 #1
Of course. Kevin needs Santos' vote to crash the US and Global economy.. emulatorloo May 2023 #2
Honor. The Unmitigated Gall May 2023 #3
They will back a lying POS after lying, criminal POS, after lying, criminal CONVICTED POS. Un-Fing B Evolve Dammit May 2023 #4
I had found this a couple years ago and I think it fits regarding him BumRushDaShow May 2023 #6
Nice! Evolve Dammit May 2023 #26
Tie it around their neck. I mean what can we expect when their lyin king is a rapist. onecaliberal May 2023 #5
Which seven Democrats voted "present"? orangecrush May 2023 #7
My thoughts as well bluestarone May 2023 #9
Here's a list. rogue emissary May 2023 #14
Thanks orangecrush May 2023 #29
I still don't get it SouthernDem4ever May 2023 #8
They have a 9 vote majority which is really a 5 vote swing. oldsoftie May 2023 #10
They have no shame. SouthernDem4ever May 2023 #11
+1 peppertree May 2023 #12
He has to be made... 2naSalit May 2023 #13
That would make an excellent reminder for voters. Kid Berwyn May 2023 #24
I guess that says it all... corruption runs through the whole GOP. ananda May 2023 #15
Santos is the poster boy for today's Republican values dlk May 2023 #16
Good Grief! His own constituents came to D.C. to call for another election! Rhiannon12866 May 2023 #17
Yup - the others in his NY delegation chickened out BumRushDaShow May 2023 #18
I guess we shouldn't be surprised, the Republican contingency still supports a criminal for POTUS Rhiannon12866 May 2023 #19
He is not the person his constituents voted for Bayard May 2023 #25
I don't support expulsion COL Mustard May 2023 #20
The whole damn republican party is rotten, top to bottom. mwb970 May 2023 #21
If reversed does ANYONE think seven Republicans would have voted "present"? Bengus81 May 2023 #22
I *think* that the 7 were all on the Ethics Committee which is already investigating him BumRushDaShow May 2023 #23
Here's the Republicans on the Committee who voted NO to expel Santos Bengus81 May 2023 #27
That vote was actually for a motion to send this matter to Committee BumRushDaShow May 2023 #28
Keep the pressure on and the coverage going lees1975 May 2023 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House Republicans block D...»Reply #28